Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare BMW F900R vs Triumph Speed Twin to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on BMW F900R vs Triumph Speed Twin; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | F900R | Speed Twin |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 12.18 L | 12.4 L |
| Power | 895.0 CC | 1200.0 CC |
| Class | Sports | Sports |
| Mileage | 23 KM/L | 20.80 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹36,175/month | ₹36,801/month |
| User Rating | 7.4 | 7.5 |
| Design | 7.50 | 8.50 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.00 | 6.75 |
| Significance | 7.75 | 7.75 |
| Safety | 7.50 | 7.75 |
| Comfort | 7.00 | 7.00 |
| Value For Money | 7.00 | 7.00 |
| Engine CC | 895.0 CC | 1200.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 92 | 112.00 |
| Top Speed | 200 kmph | N/A |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| One-piece seat bench | Yes | - |
| Upside down fork | Yes | - |
| Rear rebound adjustable | Yes | - |
| Rear pre-load adjustable | Yes | - |
| Riding Modes Rain/Road | Yes | - |
| Coloured TFT display with BMW Motorrad Connectivity | Yes | - |
| Ride By Wire | - | Yes |
| Switchable Traction Control | - | Yes |
| ABS | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The BMW F 900 R is a middleweight naked which has a lot going for it. An attractive price point, proper naked roadster ergonomics and very good performance and dynamics give it a decent attraction. The only downside is it pales in comparison to rivals in its segment which are sharper and more performance-oriented.
