Compare TVS Apache RTR 180 vs Bajaj Chetak to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on TVS Apache RTR 180 vs Bajaj Chetak; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Apache RTR 180 | Chetak |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.25 L | 1.07 L |
| Power | 177.4 CC | N/A |
| Class | Commuter | Scooter |
| Mileage | 47.00 KM/L | 0.00 Km/Full Charge |


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,693/month | ₹3,199/month |
| User Rating | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 7.75 |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.75 | 8.25 |
| Significance | 8.00 | 9.00 |
| Safety | 7.00 | 8.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.25 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 7.75 |
| Engine Type | SI, 4-stroke, Oil-cooled, Fuel-injected | N/A |
| Engine CC | 177.4 CC | N/A |
| Engine Power | 17.00 | N/A |
| Max Torque | 15.50 | 20 Nm |
| Top Speed | 113 kmph | 70 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | N/A |
| Emission Standard | BS6 | N/A |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 | N/A |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | N/A |
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection | N/A |
| Motor Power | N/A | 4,4.2 watts |
| Anti-lock braking system (ABS) | Yes | - |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | Yes | - |
| Sculpted Digital Display | Yes | - |
| MUSCLED TANK | Yes | - |
| RTR ENGINE | Yes | - |
| Synchronized Stiff Chassis | Yes | - |
| Reverse Mode | - | Yes |
| High Quality electronic switches | - | Yes |
| Eco and Sport | - | Yes |
| USB Port built in the glove box | - | Yes |
| Underseat Storage | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 180 offers a comfortable riding position for daily commutes, and in terms of design, has a sporty appeal. However, it could do better with an updated instrument cluster and better brakes. As far as performance is concerned, the RTR 180 offers enjoyable performance for intra-city riding, handles well and has a comfortable ride too. Plus, it is easy to maintain, with economical running costs.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Chetak certainly is a fitting tribute to a legendary name from Bajaj. In electric form, it's quite a likeable scooter, and it comes across as a well-built, well-finished scooter with all the features and gizmos associated with a new-age electric scooter. The only drawback for now, is its availability, but that's something which is likely to change over the next year or so. Its design is its biggest strength, coupled with its easy rideability





















































