Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Dominar 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 180 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Dominar 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 180; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Dominar 250 | Apache RTR 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.77 L | 1.25 L |
| Power | 248.8 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 35.00 KM/L | 47 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹5,243/month | ₹3,693/month |
| User Rating | 8.0 | 7.9 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 7.75 |
| Significance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Safety | 7.75 | 7.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 248.8 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Max Torque | 23.50 | 15.50 |
| Top Speed | 132 kmph | 113 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Dual Channel ABS | Yes | - |
| Anti-lock braking system (ABS) | - | Yes |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | - | Yes |
| Sculpted Digital Display | - | Yes |
| MUSCLED TANK | - | Yes |
| RTR ENGINE | - | Yes |
| Synchronized Stiff Chassis | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
In the end, what the Bajaj Dominar 250 offers is a versatile machine, which can effortlessly do the daily commute, and be equally at home handling the occasional highway run; all great qualities that make it a calm and composed 250 cc motorcycle. Although, with its 180 kg kerb weight, the Dominar 250 makes its mass felt, especially if you go seeking some thrills. It may be the near-perfect, do-it-all motorcycle, as long as you're ready to accept what it's not, and appreciate it for what it is.Brakes lack bite
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 180 offers a comfortable riding position for daily commutes, and in terms of design, has a sporty appeal. However, it could do better with an updated instrument cluster and better brakes. As far as performance is concerned, the RTR 180 offers enjoyable performance for intra-city riding, handles well and has a comfortable ride too. Plus, it is easy to maintain, with economical running costs.
