logo
New Delhi

Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Comparison

Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

Pulsar NS160 vs Classic 350 Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsPulsar NS160Classic 350
Price1.42 L1.81 L
Power160.3 CC349.0 CC
ClassCommuterCruiser
Mileage52.00 KM/L35.00 KM/L
Pulsar NS160
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.42 L
Classic 350
Royal Enfield Classic 350
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.81 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
Twin Disc ABS BS VI
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Twin Disc ABS BS VI
1.42 L
Redditch
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Redditch
1.81 L
OverviewSpecificationFeatures

Overview

Overall Rating
8.1
8.5
Design8.008.50
Performance8.008.00
Fuel Consumption8.008.00
Significance8.759.50
Safety7.758.75
Comfort8.008.25
Value For Money8.008.50

Specifications

Engine CC160.3 CC349.0 CC
Max Torque14.6027 NM @ 4000 RPM
Top Speed120 kmph115 kmph
No. of Gears5 Gears5 Gears
Starting MechanismKick / Self StartSelf / Kick Start

Features

Dual Channel ABS No Yes

Pros Cons of Bajaj Pulsar NS160

Pros

  • Sporty design
  • Peppy engine
  • Good performance

Cons

  • Stiff ride
  • Less variants
  • Plastics quality

Verdict

If you take into account the capable engine, good safety features, stylish appearance and look, comfortable riding experience and overall brand value, this bike does prove to be a value proposition. It is one of the best options for buyers in this segment. The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is a good bike to own, particularly for those seeking the sporty feeling of a roadster and a compelling exhaust and engine note without burning a hole in their pockets.Stiff ride

Pros Cons Royal Enfield Classic 350

Pros

  • Timeless retro design that continues to appeal to classic motorcycle enthusiasts
  • Solid build quality with a 349 cc J-series engine offering smooth and refined performance
  • Comfortable ride with a well-cushioned seat and upright riding posture, ideal for long commutes

Cons

  • Lacks advanced features like traction control, which are becoming common in the segment
  • Slight vibrations at higher speeds may impact comfort during extended highway rides
  • Weight (195 kg) can make it feel heavy for newer riders, especially in city traffic

Verdict

The 2024 Royal Enfield Classic 350 continues to uphold its legacy as a timeless and robust motorcycle, combining classic styling with modern engineering. Its comfortable ride and smooth engine make it a great option for long-distance cruising, while the retro design ensures it stands out on the road. However, its relatively basic feature set and heavy weight might not appeal to riders looking for cutting-edge technology or a lightweight city bike. Overall, the Classic 350 remains a top choice for those who value style, comfort, and heritage.

Explore Bikes Similar to Bajaj Pulsar NS160

Explore Cars Similar to Royal Enfield Classic 350

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Latest Comparison Video

Compare Bikes By Body Type

Loading BreadCrumbs...