Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield 2024 Classic 350 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Royal Enfield 2024 Classic 350; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar NS160 | Classic 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.42 L | 1.81 L |
| Power | 160.3 CC | 349.0 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Cruiser |
| Mileage | 52.00 KM/L | 0.00 - 35.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹4,221/month | ₹5,375/month |
| User Rating | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 8.75 | 9.50 |
| Safety | 7.75 | 8.75 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.25 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Engine CC | 160.3 CC | 349.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 14.60 | 27.00 |
| Top Speed | 120 kmph | 115 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| Pass Light | Yes | - |
| Clear-Lens Indicator Lenses | Yes | - |
| AHO (Automatic Headlamps On) | Yes | - |
| Back-lit Switchgear | Yes | - |
| BSIV Compliant Engine | Yes | - |
| Single Channel ABS | - | No |
| Anti-lock Braking System | - | No |
| Dual Channel ABS | - | Yes |
