Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Pulsar RS 200 vs TVS Apache RTR 180 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar RS 200 vs TVS Apache RTR 180; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar RS 200 | Apache RTR 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.71 L | 1.25 L |
| Power | 199.5 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Class | Sports | Commuter |
| Mileage | 35 KM/L | 47.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹5,078/month | ₹3,693/month |
| User Rating | 8.0 | 7.9 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.50 | 7.75 |
| Significance | 8.75 | 8.00 |
| Safety | 7.75 | 7.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 199.5 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Max Torque | 18.60 | 15.50 |
| Top Speed | 141 kmph | 113 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 5 Gears |
| BSIV Engine | No | - |
| Anti-lock braking system (ABS) | - | Yes |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | - | Yes |
| Sculpted Digital Display | - | Yes |
| MUSCLED TANK | - | Yes |
| RTR ENGINE | - | Yes |
| Synchronized Stiff Chassis | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is a solid performer in the 200 cc segment, offering a good balance of power, comfort, and safety features like ABS. While its handling could be improved for more aggressive riding, and its styling might not be to everyone’s taste, it still offers excellent value for riders looking for a fast, comfortable, and feature-packed sports bike. It may not be as sharp as the Yamaha R15 or KTM RC200, but for those seeking a practical, everyday sports bike with a bit of flair, the RS200 delivers.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 180 offers a comfortable riding position for daily commutes, and in terms of design, has a sporty appeal. However, it could do better with an updated instrument cluster and better brakes. As far as performance is concerned, the RTR 180 offers enjoyable performance for intra-city riding, handles well and has a comfortable ride too. Plus, it is easy to maintain, with economical running costs.
