logo
Select City
AD

Kawasaki W175 vs Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison

Compare Kawasaki W175 vs Bajaj Pulsar N160 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Kawasaki W175 vs Bajaj Pulsar N160; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

W175 vs Pulsar N160 Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsW175Pulsar N160
Price1.15 L1.22 L
Power177.0 CC164.5,164.8 CC
ClassCommuterCommuter
Mileage45.00 KM/L51.00 KM/L
W175
Kawasaki W175
Ex-Showroom Price
1.15 L
Pulsar N160
Bajaj Pulsar N160
Ex-Showroom Price
1.22 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
2023
Kawasaki W175
2023
1.15 L
SD USD Single Seat
Bajaj Pulsar N160
SD USD Single Seat
1.22 L

Overview

Overall Rating
N/A
7.1
Design-8.00
Performance-8.00
Fuel Consumption-7.00
Significance-7.00
Safety-7.00
Comfort-7.00
Value For Money-6.00

Specifications

Engine CC177.0 CC164.8 CC
Max Torque13.2 Nm @ 6000 Rpm14.65 Nm @ 6750 Rpm
Top Speed110 kmph120 kmph
No. of Gears5 Gears5 Gears
Starting MechanismSelf,Self,Self Start
Ground Clearance165 mm mm165 mm mm
Kerb Weight135 KG148,151,152 KG
Seat Height785,790 mm795 mm
Fuel tank Capacity12.0 L14.0 L
Mileage45 KM/L51 KM/L
Front Brake TypeDiscDisc
Rear Brake TypeDrumDisc
Front Tyre80/100 -17M/C (46P)100/80-R17 Tubeless
Rear Tyre100/90 -17M/C (55P)130/70-R17 Tubeless
Wheel TypeAlloy Wheels,Spoke WheelAlloy Wheel,Alloy Wheels

Features

USB connectivity No Yes
Tubeless Tyre No Yes
Dual-Channel ABS No Yes
LED Tail Lamp With Glitter Pattern No Yes
LED Projector Headlamp No Yes
Constant Mesh Transmission No Yes
Air-Cooled Engine No Yes
Saree Guard No Yes
Assist & Slipper Clutch No Yes
Stand Alarm No Yes
Service Reminder Indicator No Yes
Underbelly Exhaust No Yes
USB Charging Port No Yes
Malfunction Indicator No Yes
Reverse Monochrome LCD Console No Yes
Turn-by-Turn Navigation (TBT) No Yes
AD

Pros Cons of Kawasaki W175

Pros

  • The authentic retro styling draws heavily from 1960s W-series models.
  • At just 135 kg, it is nimble and easy to handle, which builds confidence for beginner riders.
  • Its 177 cc air-cooled single-cylinder engine has a smooth power delivery with minimal vibrations at 100 kmph.
  • It has a five-speed gearbox that operates with smooth click and an easy-to-find neutral position.
  • A soft suspension setup handles road undulations and broken patches comfortably.
  • It offers progressive braking capabilities which is assisted by single-channel ABS.

Cons

  • The price tag puts it close to larger-capacity bikes like the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin.
  • It misses out on modern equipment like LED lighting, tubeless tyres, alloy wheels and rear disc brake.
  • Low-end torque feels muted and needs you work the engine to get some lively output.
  • It lacks a tachometer, gear-position indicator, and Bluetooth connectivity. 
  • The front disc brake does not have a sharp lever bite when stopping from higher speeds.

Verdict

The Kawasaki W175 is for those who need access to classic motorcycling. It offers light handling, neat retro styling, and a refined 177 cc engine. What also helps its case is the low weight and soft suspension, which makes it forgiving for beginners riding in traffic.

Seshan Vijayraghvan said in his review, “Yes, the price is a bit steep for a 177 cc motorcycle, but the W175 looks nice, comes with a very refined engine and has the potential to be a good beginner’s motorcycle.”

At the same time, the lack of modern features, absence of brighter lighting, and the modest low-end power output makes its asking price hard to justify. Especially when compared to similarly priced rivals such as the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin.

Explore Bikes Similar to Kawasaki W175

Explore Cars Similar to Bajaj Pulsar N160

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Compare Bikes By Body Type