New Delhi

Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar 220F Comparison

Compare Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar 220F to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar 220F; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

Classic 350 vs Pulsar 220 Comparison Overview

Key Highlights	Classic 350	Pulsar 220
Price	1.81 L	1.28 L
Power	349.0 CC	220.0 CC
Class	Cruiser	Commuter
Mileage	35.00 KM/L	40 KM/L

Royal Enfield Classic 350

*Ex-Showroom Price

₹1.81 L

Bajaj Pulsar 220

*Ex-Showroom Price

₹1.28 L

Add

Only Show Differences

Royal Enfield Classic 350

Redditch

1.81 L

Bajaj Pulsar 220

Bluetooth

1.28 L

Overview Specification Features

Overview

Overall Rating	8.5	N/A
Design	8.50	-
Performance	8.00	-
Fuel Consumption	8.00	-
Significance	9.50	-
Safety	8.75	-
Comfort	8.25	-
Value For Money	8.50	-

Specifications

Engine CC	349.0 CC	220.0 CC
Max Torque	27 NM @ 4000 RPM	18.55 Nm @ 7000 Rpm
Top Speed	115 kmph	135 kmph
No. of Gears	5 Gears	5 Gears
Starting Mechanism	Self / Kick Start	Self Start

Features

Self-Cancelling Indicators	No	Yes
5 Spoke Alloy Wheels	No	Yes
Projector Headlamp That Provides A Wider Beam For Better Low Light Visibility	No	Yes

Pros Cons of Royal Enfield Classic 350

Pros

Timeless retro design that continues to appeal to classic motorcycle enthusiasts
Solid build quality with a 349 cc J-series engine offering smooth and refined performance
Comfortable ride with a well-cushioned seat and upright riding posture, ideal for long commutes

Cons

Lacks advanced features like traction control, which are becoming common in the segment
Slight vibrations at higher speeds may impact comfort during extended highway rides
Weight (195 kg) can make it feel heavy for newer riders, especially in city traffic

Verdict

The 2024 Royal Enfield Classic 350 continues to uphold its legacy as a timeless and robust motorcycle, combining classic styling with modern engineering. Its comfortable ride and smooth engine make it a great option for long-distance cruising, while the retro design ensures it stands out on the road. However, its relatively basic feature set and heavy weight might not appeal to riders looking for cutting-edge technology or a lightweight city bike. Overall, the Classic 350 remains a top choice for those who value style, comfort, and heritage.

Pros Cons Bajaj Pulsar 220

Pros

The 220 cc DTS-i engine delivers 20.8 bhp and 19.12 Nm of torque, ensuring strong performance for both city commutes and highway rides.
The bike can accelerate from 0 to 60 kmph in 3.8 seconds and reach a top speed of 144 kmph, making it one of the fastest in its segment.
Features like a semi-fairing, projector headlamps, and a comfortable seating posture make it ideal for long rides.

Cons

The design has remained largely unchanged, which may not appeal to those seeking a more modern look.
While powerful, the 5-speed gearbox might feel limited compared to 6-speed options available in newer bikes.
The competition in this segment offers more advanced features, potentially making the Pulsar 220F feel dated in comparison

Verdict

The Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a high-performance, value-for-money bike that excels in both city commuting and long-distance touring. While its design and features may feel slightly outdated compared to newer models, its strong engine, comfortable ergonomics, and reliable performance make it an excellent choice for riders seeking a well-rounded and affordable option in the 200-250 cc segment.