Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Royal Enfield 2024 Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Royal Enfield 2024 Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Classic 350 | Pulsar NS160 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.81 L | 1.42 L |
| Power | 349.0 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Class | Cruiser | Commuter |
| Mileage | 0.00 - 35.00 KM/L | 52.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹5,375/month | ₹4,221/month |
| User Rating | 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Design | 8.50 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 9.50 | 8.75 |
| Safety | 8.75 | 7.75 |
| Comfort | 8.25 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 8.50 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 349.0 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Max Torque | 27.00 | 14.60 |
| Top Speed | 115 kmph | 120 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Single Channel ABS | No | - |
| Anti-lock Braking System | No | - |
| Dual Channel ABS | Yes | - |
| ABS | - | Yes |
| Pass Light | - | Yes |
| Clear-Lens Indicator Lenses | - | Yes |
| AHO (Automatic Headlamps On) | - | Yes |
| Back-lit Switchgear | - | Yes |
| BSIV Compliant Engine | - | Yes |
