logo
New Delhi

Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Comparison

Compare Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

Classic 350 vs Pulsar NS160 Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsClassic 350Pulsar NS160
Price1.81 L1.42 L
Power349.0 CC160.3 CC
ClassCruiserCommuter
Mileage35.00 KM/L52.00 KM/L
Classic 350
Royal Enfield Classic 350
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.81 L
Pulsar NS160
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.42 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
Redditch
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Redditch
1.81 L
Twin Disc ABS BS VI
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
Twin Disc ABS BS VI
1.42 L
OverviewSpecificationFeatures

Overview

Overall Rating
8.5
8.1
Design8.508.00
Performance8.008.00
Fuel Consumption8.008.00
Significance9.508.75
Safety8.757.75
Comfort8.258.00
Value For Money8.508.00

Specifications

Engine CC349.0 CC160.3 CC
Max Torque27 NM @ 4000 RPM14.60
Top Speed115 kmph120 kmph
No. of Gears5 Gears5 Gears
Starting MechanismSelf / Kick StartKick / Self Start

Features

ABS No Yes
Pass Light No Yes
Clear-Lens Indicator Lenses No Yes
AHO (Automatic Headlamps On) No Yes
Back-lit Switchgear No Yes
BSIV Compliant Engine No Yes

Pros Cons of Royal Enfield Classic 350

Pros

  • Timeless retro design that continues to appeal to classic motorcycle enthusiasts
  • Solid build quality with a 349 cc J-series engine offering smooth and refined performance
  • Comfortable ride with a well-cushioned seat and upright riding posture, ideal for long commutes

Cons

  • Lacks advanced features like traction control, which are becoming common in the segment
  • Slight vibrations at higher speeds may impact comfort during extended highway rides
  • Weight (195 kg) can make it feel heavy for newer riders, especially in city traffic

Verdict

The 2024 Royal Enfield Classic 350 continues to uphold its legacy as a timeless and robust motorcycle, combining classic styling with modern engineering. Its comfortable ride and smooth engine make it a great option for long-distance cruising, while the retro design ensures it stands out on the road. However, its relatively basic feature set and heavy weight might not appeal to riders looking for cutting-edge technology or a lightweight city bike. Overall, the Classic 350 remains a top choice for those who value style, comfort, and heritage.

Pros Cons Bajaj Pulsar NS160

Pros

  • Sporty design
  • Peppy engine
  • Good performance

Cons

  • Stiff ride
  • Less variants
  • Plastics quality

Verdict

If you take into account the capable engine, good safety features, stylish appearance and look, comfortable riding experience and overall brand value, this bike does prove to be a value proposition. It is one of the best options for buyers in this segment. The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is a good bike to own, particularly for those seeking the sporty feeling of a roadster and a compelling exhaust and engine note without burning a hole in their pockets.Stiff ride

Explore Bikes Similar to Royal Enfield Classic 350

Explore Cars Similar to Bajaj Pulsar NS160

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Latest Comparison Video

Compare Bikes By Body Type

Loading BreadCrumbs...