Compare TVS Apache RTR 160 vs BMW K 1600 B to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on TVS Apache RTR 160 vs BMW K 1600 B; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Apache RTR 160 | K 1600 B |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.11 L | 33.72 L |
| Power | 159.7 CC | 1649.0 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Sports |
| Mileage | 47.00 KM/L | 16.94 KM/L |


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,298/month | ₹1,00,082/month |
| User Rating | 7.9 | 7.7 |
| Design | 7.50 | 7.50 |
| Performance | 7.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 7.00 |
| Significance | 9.00 | 7.75 |
| Safety | 7.00 | 8.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 8.50 | 7.00 |
| Engine CC | 159.7 CC | 1649.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 13.85 Nm @ 7000 Rpm | 180.00 |
| Top Speed | 107 kmph | 200 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 6 Gears |
| Sculpted Digital Display | No | - |
| RTR ENGINE | No | - |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | No | - |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| MUSCLED TANK | No | - |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 160 2V remains a fun and agile motorcycle, especially in urban settings, with a peppy engine and lightweight frame. However, the engine’s age shows with noticeable vibrations at higher speeds, and its softer suspension affects ride quality on rough roads. While it’s still a good option for those looking for a simple, no-nonsense ride, the marginal price difference with the more advanced Apache RTR 160 4V makes the latter a better choice in this segment.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The BMW K 1600 B has ample performance for a bagger of its size. It looks good, has superb presence, great performance and will eat up the miles if you’re inclined towards touring. The only downside could be the price and cost of ownership.















































