Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Honda X-Blade to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Honda X-Blade; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar 220 | X-Blade |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.1 L | 89,839 |
| Power | 220.0 CC | 162.7 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 40 KM/L | 50 KM/L |


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,265/month | ₹2,671/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 8.1 |
| Design | 8.25 | |
| Performance | 8.00 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | |
| Significance | 8.50 | |
| Safety | 8.00 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Value For Money | 8.25 |
| Engine CC | 220.0 CC | 162.7 CC |
| Engine Power | N/A | 13.93 |
| Max Torque | 19.12 | 13.90 |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Valves per Cylinder | N/A | 2 |
| Cooling System | N/A | Air Cooled |
| Fuel Delivery | N/A | Carburetor |
| Self-Cancelling Indicators | Yes | - |
| 5 Spoke Alloy Wheels | Yes | - |
| Projector Headlamp That Provides A Wider Beam For Better Low Light Visibility | Yes | - |
| ABS | - | No |
| First-In-Class Robo-Face LED Headlamp | - | Yes |
| Dual outlet Muffler | - | Yes |
| Razor Edged LED Tail Lamp | - | Yes |
| Aggressive-Sculpted Tank Design | - | Yes |
| Wide Rear Tyre With Hugger Fender | - | Yes |
| Powerful 160cc Engine | - | Yes |
| Low Maintenance Seal Chain | - | Yes |
| MonoShock Suspension | - | Yes |
| Long Seat | - | Yes |
| Groovy Grab Rail | - | Yes |
| Street-Tech Digital Meter | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
For the price, the X-Blade proves to be nice all-round commuter and scores high on looks and design. The LED headlamp and tail lamp are a welcome addition to the package. The 160 cc segment hasn't quite fired for Honda in the last few years and with the X-Blade, it looks to change the same. The good thing is that the X-Blade is a decently capable product and sure has the potential to get some good sales figures for Honda.







































