logo
New Delhi

Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Himalayan Comparison

Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Himalayan to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Himalayan; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

Pulsar 220 vs Himalayan Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsPulsar 220Himalayan
Price1.1 L1.9 L
Power220.0 CC411.0 CC
ClassCommuterOff Road
Mileage40 KM/L45.00 KM/L
Pulsar 220
Bajaj Pulsar 220
*Ex-Showroom Price
1.1 L
Himalayan
Royal Enfield Himalayan
*Ex-Showroom Price
1.9 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
STD
Bajaj Pulsar 220
STD
1.1 L
STD
Royal Enfield Himalayan
STD
1.9 L

Overview

Overall Rating
N/A
7.9
Design-7.50
Performance-7.75
Fuel Consumption-7.00
Significance-9.00
Safety-7.00
Comfort-7.75
Value For Money-8.50

Specifications

Engine CC220.0 CC411.0 CC
Max Torque19.1232.00
No. of Gears5 Gears5 Gears
Starting MechanismSelf StartSelf Start

Features

ABS No Yes
Silencer Increases Water Wading Ability No Yes
220mm Of Ground Clearance No Yes
Comes with An Optimized Handlebar No Yes
External Cooling System For The Crankcase Oil No Yes
Comprehensive Instrument Cluster No Yes
Dual Channel ABS No Yes

Pros Cons of Bajaj Pulsar 220

Pros

  • The 220 cc DTS-i engine delivers 20.8 bhp and 19.12 Nm of torque, ensuring strong performance for both city commutes and highway rides.
  • The bike can accelerate from 0 to 60 kmph in 3.8 seconds and reach a top speed of 144 kmph, making it one of the fastest in its segment.
  • Features like a semi-fairing, projector headlamps, and a comfortable seating posture make it ideal for long rides.

Cons

  • The design has remained largely unchanged, which may not appeal to those seeking a more modern look.
  • While powerful, the 5-speed gearbox might feel limited compared to 6-speed options available in newer bikes.
  • The competition in this segment offers more advanced features, potentially making the Pulsar 220F feel dated in comparison

Verdict

The Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a high-performance, value-for-money bike that excels in both city commuting and long-distance touring. While its design and features may feel slightly outdated compared to newer models, its strong engine, comfortable ergonomics, and reliable performance make it an excellent choice for riders seeking a well-rounded and affordable option in the 200-250 cc segment.

Pros Cons Royal Enfield Himalayan

Pros

  • Versatile budget ADV motorcycle
  • Good Ride quality
  • Hardy motorcycle

Cons

  • Engine lacks power for seasoned riders
  • Could have been lighter
  • Brakes could have been better

Verdict

The Royal Enfield Himalayan definitely is a good bike, and the more time you spend time with it, the more you begin appreciating it. Sure, it has its weaknesses, and more power, less weight, better brakes et al, would have worked wonders to make it even better. But eventually, what matters is that it's a simple motorcycle that will charm you with its simplicity, whether you're the city commuter, relaxed highway cruiser, or trudging along broken trails.

Explore Bikes Similar to Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Explore Cars Similar to Royal Enfield Himalayan

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Compare Bikes By Body Type

Loading BreadCrumbs...