Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare BMW R 1250 RT vs BMW K 1600 B to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on BMW R 1250 RT vs BMW K 1600 B; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | R 1250 RT | K 1600 B |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 26.66 L | 33.72 L |
| Power | 1254.0 CC | 1649.0 CC |
| Class | Sports | Sports |
| Mileage | 21.00 KM/L | 16.94 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹79,109/month | ₹1,00,082/month |
| User Rating | 7.3 | 7.7 |
| Design | 7.50 | 7.50 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.00 | 7.00 |
| Significance | 5.50 | 7.75 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 7.00 | 7.00 |
| Engine CC | 1254.0 CC | 1649.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 143.00 | 180.00 |
| Top Speed | 200 kmph | 200 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| ABS | Yes | - |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The BMW R 1250 RT has a smooth engine, enough and more performance, with crisp throttle response and a comfortable ride. Despite its intimidating size, the R 1250 RT is surprisingly agile. It's still an expensive bike, and isn't made for bumper to bumper commutes if that's what you'll be doing mostly.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The BMW K 1600 B has ample performance for a bagger of its size. It looks good, has superb presence, great performance and will eat up the miles if you’re inclined towards touring. The only downside could be the price and cost of ownership.
