Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs TVS Apache RTR 180 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs TVS Apache RTR 180; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Ninja 650 | Apache RTR 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 7.77 L | 1.25 L |
| Power | 649.0 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Class | Sports | Commuter |
| Mileage | 21.00 KM/L | 47 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹23,050/month | ₹3,693/month |
| User Rating | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Design | 7.50 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 7.75 |
| Significance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 7.00 |
| Comfort | 9.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 7.50 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 649.0 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Max Torque | 64.00 | 15.50 |
| Top Speed | 210 kmph | 113 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Improved Windshield | Yes | - |
| Smartphone Connectivity | Yes | - |
| TFT Colour Instrumentation | Yes | - |
| Suspension | No | - |
| Anti-lock braking system (ABS) | - | Yes |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | - | Yes |
| Sculpted Digital Display | - | Yes |
| MUSCLED TANK | - | Yes |
| RTR ENGINE | - | Yes |
| Synchronized Stiff Chassis | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Ninja 650 may be a middleweight, but it feels like a small bike, and it doesn't have the intake roar or exhaust note associated with a high-performance motorcycle. It feels at ease handling traffic, and is equally comfortable on the highway, if you're in the mood for occasional long-distance touring. If you're looking to upgrade from a smaller bike, or you're new to motorcycling, the Kawasaki Ninja 650 could well be all the bike you need.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 180 offers a comfortable riding position for daily commutes, and in terms of design, has a sporty appeal. However, it could do better with an updated instrument cluster and better brakes. As far as performance is concerned, the RTR 180 offers enjoyable performance for intra-city riding, handles well and has a comfortable ride too. Plus, it is easy to maintain, with economical running costs.
