Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Hyosung Aquila 250 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Hyosung Aquila 250; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Himalayan | Aquila 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.9 L | 3.01 L |
| Power | 411.0 CC | 249.0 CC |
| Class | Off Road | Cruiser |
| Mileage | 45 KM/L | 30 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹5,639/month | ₹8,937/month |
| User Rating | 7.9 | N/A |
| Design | 7.50 | |
| Performance | 7.75 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.00 | |
| Significance | 9.00 | |
| Safety | 7.00 | |
| Comfort | 7.75 | |
| Value For Money | 8.50 |
| Engine CC | 411.0 CC | 249.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 32.00 | 21.37 |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| Silencer Increases Water Wading Ability | Yes | - |
| The Optimised Handlebar | No | - |
| 220mm Of Ground Clearance | Yes | - |
| Comes with An Optimized Handlebar | Yes | - |
| External Cooling System For The Crankcase Oil | Yes | - |
| Comprehensive Instrument Cluster | Yes | - |
| Dual Channel ABS | Yes | - |
| Hydraulic Disc Brakes | - | Yes |
| V-Twin 250cc Engine | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Royal Enfield Himalayan definitely is a good bike, and the more time you spend time with it, the more you begin appreciating it. Sure, it has its weaknesses, and more power, less weight, better brakes et al, would have worked wonders to make it even better. But eventually, what matters is that it's a simple motorcycle that will charm you with its simplicity, whether you're the city commuter, relaxed highway cruiser, or trudging along broken trails.
