Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar 200 NS | FZ S V3.0 FI | 
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.32 L | 1.13 L | 
| Power | 199.5 CC | 149.0 CC | 
| Class | Commuter | Sports | 
| Mileage | 36 KM/L | 49 KM/L | 


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,924/month | ₹3,364/month | 
| User Rating | 7.9 | 8.1 | 
| Design | 8.00 | 8.00 | 
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 | 
| Fuel Consumption | 7.50 | 8.00 | 
| Significance | 8.50 | 9.00 | 
| Safety | 7.75 | 7.75 | 
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 | 
| Value For Money | 7.75 | 8.00 | 
| Engine CC | 199.5 CC | 149.0 CC | 
| Max Torque | 18.30 | 13.30 | 
| Top Speed | 136 kmph | 103,115 kmph | 
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 5 Gears | 
| AHO(Automatic Headlamp On) | Yes | - | 
| ABS | Yes | Yes | 
| BSIV Engine | Yes | - | 
| Bluetooth | - | Yes | 
| LCD Instrument Cluster | - | Yes | 
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The 2023 Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 stays true to its legacy with impressive performance, sharp handling, and new updates like USD forks and dual-channel ABS, which improve its dynamics. While it may not have cutting-edge features, it remains a solid choice for riders who prioritize a simple, reliable, and fun-to-ride machine. Its price point and updated mechanics make it a compelling option in the 200 cc segment, even though it faces competition from newer models with more tech.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Yamaha FZ S V 3.0 is an excellent motorcycle for commuting within the city. It is ergonomically balanced and the engine has lots of zeal. Torque offered is ample and the refinement level is commendable with a decent mileage figire. To top it off, Yamaha's reliability is an added bonus. However, it misses out on basic features available with its rivals, and also lacks character in its design. Overall built quality could've been improved.



















































