logo
New Delhi

Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Comparison

Compare Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Royal Enfield Classic 350; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

Pulsar 220 vs Classic 350 Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsPulsar 220Classic 350
Price1.28 L1.81 L
Power220.0 CC349.0 CC
ClassCommuterCruiser
Mileage40.00 KM/L35 KM/L
Pulsar 220
Bajaj Pulsar 220
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.28 L
Classic 350
Royal Enfield Classic 350
*Ex-Showroom Price
₹1.81 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
Bluetooth
Bajaj Pulsar 220
Bluetooth
1.28 L
Redditch
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Redditch
1.81 L
OverviewSpecificationFeatures

Overview

Overall Rating
N/A
8.5
Design-8.50
Performance-8.00
Fuel Consumption-8.00
Significance-9.50
Safety-8.75
Comfort-8.25
Value For Money-8.50

Specifications

Engine CC220.0 CC349.0 CC
Max Torque18.55 Nm @ 7000 Rpm27 NM @ 4000 RPM
Top Speed135 kmph115 kmph
No. of Gears5 Gears5 Gears
Starting MechanismSelf StartSelf / Kick Start

Features

Dual Channel ABS No Yes

Pros Cons of Bajaj Pulsar 220

Pros

  • The 220 cc DTS-i engine delivers 20.8 bhp and 19.12 Nm of torque, ensuring strong performance for both city commutes and highway rides.
  • The bike can accelerate from 0 to 60 kmph in 3.8 seconds and reach a top speed of 144 kmph, making it one of the fastest in its segment.
  • Features like a semi-fairing, projector headlamps, and a comfortable seating posture make it ideal for long rides.

Cons

  • The design has remained largely unchanged, which may not appeal to those seeking a more modern look.
  • While powerful, the 5-speed gearbox might feel limited compared to 6-speed options available in newer bikes.
  • The competition in this segment offers more advanced features, potentially making the Pulsar 220F feel dated in comparison

Verdict

The Bajaj Pulsar 220F is a high-performance, value-for-money bike that excels in both city commuting and long-distance touring. While its design and features may feel slightly outdated compared to newer models, its strong engine, comfortable ergonomics, and reliable performance make it an excellent choice for riders seeking a well-rounded and affordable option in the 200-250 cc segment.

Pros Cons Royal Enfield Classic 350

Pros

  • Timeless retro design that continues to appeal to classic motorcycle enthusiasts
  • Solid build quality with a 349 cc J-series engine offering smooth and refined performance
  • Comfortable ride with a well-cushioned seat and upright riding posture, ideal for long commutes

Cons

  • Lacks advanced features like traction control, which are becoming common in the segment
  • Slight vibrations at higher speeds may impact comfort during extended highway rides
  • Weight (195 kg) can make it feel heavy for newer riders, especially in city traffic

Verdict

The 2024 Royal Enfield Classic 350 continues to uphold its legacy as a timeless and robust motorcycle, combining classic styling with modern engineering. Its comfortable ride and smooth engine make it a great option for long-distance cruising, while the retro design ensures it stands out on the road. However, its relatively basic feature set and heavy weight might not appeal to riders looking for cutting-edge technology or a lightweight city bike. Overall, the Classic 350 remains a top choice for those who value style, comfort, and heritage.

Explore Bikes Similar to Bajaj Pulsar 220F

Explore Cars Similar to Royal Enfield Classic 350

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Latest Comparison Video

Compare Bikes By Body Type

Loading BreadCrumbs...