Compare Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar N160 | Apache RTR 160 4V |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 1.15 L |
| Power | 164.8 CC | 159.7 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 55 - 59 KM/L | 30.00 - 45.00 KM/L |


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,364/month | ₹3,430/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 8.4 |
| Design | 8.50 | |
| Performance | 8.50 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | |
| Significance | 9.00 | |
| Safety | 8.00 | |
| Comfort | 8.50 | |
| Value For Money | 8.50 |
| Engine CC | 164.8 CC | 159.7 CC |
| Engine Power | 15.70 | N/A |
| Max Torque | 14.65 | 14.80 |
| Top Speed | N/A | 114 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | N/A |
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection | N/A |
| USB connectivity | Yes | - |
| Dual Channel ABS | - | No |
| Day Time Running Light | - | Yes |
| ABS | - | Yes |
| Engine Cowl | - | Yes |
| Racing Double Barrel Exhaust | - | Yes |
| Aggressive Tank Cowl | - | Yes |
| Aggressive Headlamp | - | Yes |
| Fully Digital Interactive Speedometer | - | Yes |
| Roto-Petal Disc Brake | - | Yes |
| Foam-In-Place Racing Seat | - | Yes |
| Electronic Fuel Injection System | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 stands out as a refined and well-rounded premium commuter motorcycle in the 160 cc segment. With segment-first features like dual-channel ABS, a smooth engine, and impressive ride quality, it offers great value for everyday riders. While it may not have cutting-edge tech or top-end performance, the Pulsar N160 makes for a compelling choice for those seeking comfort, safety, and reliability in city riding. A solid option in its class.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V BS6 model continues to be one of the best options in the 160cc segment, offering a refined engine and sporty handling. The updates in design and the new headlamp add to its appeal, though the slight drop in power and the absence of advanced features like SmartXonnect might leave some wanting more. Overall, it remains a solid and stylish performer in its class, offering good value for its price.



















































