Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare BMW F900XR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on BMW F900XR vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | F900XR | Continental GT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 12.55 L | 3.5 L |
| Power | 895.0 CC | 648.0 CC |
| Class | Off Road | Cruiser |
| Mileage | 23.80 KM/L | 27.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹37,263/month | ₹10,387/month |
| User Rating | 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.00 | 7.00 |
| Significance | 7.50 | 8.75 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.25 |
| Value For Money | 7.50 | 8.50 |
| Engine Type | Water-cooled, 4-stroke In-line Two-cylinder Engine, Four Valves | N/A |
| Engine CC | 895.0 CC | 648.0 CC |
| Engine Power | 105 | N/A |
| Max Torque | 92.00 | 52.3 |
| Top Speed | 200 kmph | 170 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| Emission Standard | BS6-Compliant | N/A |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 | N/A |
| Cooling System | Liquid-cooled | N/A |
| Fuel Delivery | Electronic Fuel Injection | N/A |
| Electronic immobiliser | Yes | - |
| One-piece seat bench | Yes | - |
| Windscreen adjustable | Yes | - |
| Upside down fork | Yes | - |
| Rear pre-load adjustable | Yes | - |
| Riding Modes Rain/Road | Yes | - |
| ABS | - | Yes |
