Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Ducati Scrambler 1100 vs Kawasaki Z900RS to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Ducati Scrambler 1100 vs Kawasaki Z900RS; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Scrambler 1100 | Z900RS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 11.52 L | 18.67 L |
| Power | 1079.0 CC | 948.0 CC |
| Class | Sports | Sports |
| Mileage | 19 KM/L | 15.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹34,163/month | ₹55,400/month |
| User Rating | 8.3 | N/A |
| Design | 8.00 | |
| Performance | 8.00 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.25 | |
| Significance | 9.00 | |
| Safety | 9.00 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Value For Money | 8.25 |
| Engine CC | 1079.0 CC | 948.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 88.00 | 98.50 |
| Top Speed | 215 kmph | 220 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| Instrument Console | - | Analog with Dig |
| Odometer | - | Digital |
| Speedometer | - | Analogue |
| Fuel Gauge | - | Yes |
| Start Mechanism | - | Electric Start |
| Hazard Warning Indicator | - | Yes |
| Stand Indicator | - | Yes |
| Tripmeter Count | - | Yes |
| Tripmeter Type | - | Digital |
| Tachometer | - | Analogue |
| Low Battery Indicator | - | Yes |
| Gear Indicator | - | Yes |
| Low Fuel Indicator | - | Yes |
| Clock | - | Yes |
| Service Reminder Indicator | - | Yes |
| Pillion Seat Type | - | Standard |
| Remote Key | - | No |
| Cruise Control | - | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | - |
| Cornering ABS | Yes | - |
| Dual-Dial Instrumentation with Multi-Function LCD | - | Yes |
| Kawasaki’s First Tuned Exhaust Note | - | Yes |
| ABS and Traction Control | - | Yes |
| LED Headlamp | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
At a price of ₹ 11.42 lakh, you get a motorcycle which is seriously good-looking. And while it may not be a proper scrambler, because this one is better off sticking to tarmac, it sure does have grin-inducing performance. Plus, the motorcycle is packed with technology and exotic cycle parts and the quality is top notch too. Can it be used as a daily ride, yes absolutely! Would it be fine with going off-road? Not quite, because it is simply not meant to!
