Compare Bajaj Pulsar 125 vs Honda Shine 125 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar 125 vs Honda Shine 125; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar 125 | CB Shine | 
|---|---|---|
| Price | 79,048 | 78,540 | 
| Power | 124.4 CC | 123.9 CC | 
| Class | Commuter | Commuter | 
| Mileage | 51.00 KM/L | 65.00 KM/L | 


| EMI Starting From | ₹2,341/month | ₹2,341/month | 
| User Rating | 7.9 | 8.1 | 
| Design | 8.00 | 7.75 | 
| Performance | 7.50 | 7.75 | 
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.50 | 
| Significance | 8.75 | 9.00 | 
| Safety | 7.75 | 7.75 | 
| Comfort | 7.50 | 7.75 | 
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.00 | 
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, Twin Spark BSVI Compliant DTS-i Engine | 4 Stroke, SI, BS-VI Engine | 
| Engine CC | 124.4 CC | 123.9 CC | 
| Engine Power | 11.80 | 10.6 | 
| Max Torque | 10.80 | 11 | 
| Top Speed | 99 kmph | 100 kmph | 
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 4 Gears | 
| Emission Standard | BS 6 | BS VI | 
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 | 2 | 
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled | 
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection | Fuel Injection | 
| CBS | Yes | - | 
| Tubeless Tyres | - | Yes | 
| Combi Brake System With Equalizer | - | Yes | 
| 5 Step Adjustable Suspension | - | Yes | 
| Outstanding Tail Light | - | Yes | 
| Chrome Finish Muffler | - | Yes | 
| Chrome Carburetor Cover | - | Yes | 
| Modern Graphics | - | Yes | 
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Pulsar 125 has a smooth, refined and decently powerful engine. The excellent ride quality, and impressive stability only enhance its capabilities as a well-rounded commuter motorcycle. The only dampener is that its design looks much too common, and identical to the Pulsar 150 Neon. But that strategy could well work to the Pulsar 125's advantage, boasting of similar engaging performance, similar dimensions as the bigger Pulsar 150, but in a more fuel-efficient package.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Honda CB Shine continues to be a top contender in the commuter segment, offering a reliable and fuel-efficient option for city riders. With its smooth engine, low maintenance costs, and practical features, it provides excellent value for money. While it may lack some advanced features, its comfort and fuel efficiency make it a strong choice for daily commuting



















































