Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX vs BMW F900R to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX vs BMW F900R; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Ninja 1000 | F900R |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 12.98 L | 12.18 L |
| Power | 1043.0 CC | 895.0 CC |
| Class | Sports | Sports |
| Mileage | 17 KM/L | 23 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹38,549/month | ₹36,175/month |
| User Rating | 8.2 | 7.4 |
| Design | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Performance | 8.50 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.50 | 7.00 |
| Significance | 8.00 | 7.75 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Comfort | 9.00 | 7.00 |
| Value For Money | 7.75 | 7.00 |
| Engine CC | 1043.0 CC | 895.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 111.00 | 92 |
| Top Speed | 244 kmph | 200 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| ABS and Switchable Traction Control | Yes | - |
| Assist And Slipper Clutch | Yes | - |
| One-piece seat bench | - | Yes |
| Upside down fork | - | Yes |
| Rear rebound adjustable | - | Yes |
| Rear pre-load adjustable | - | Yes |
| Riding Modes Rain/Road | - | Yes |
| Coloured TFT display with BMW Motorrad Connectivity | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX remains one of the most accessible litre-class full-faired offerings on sale and the in-line four-pot motor makes for a highly likeable highway companion. Powered by a 1,043 cc liquid-cooled, four-pot motor that develops 140 bhp at 10,000 rpm and 111 Nm of peak torque at 8,000 rpm, the bike has a lot of electronic aids including ABS, cruise control, three-level traction control, Kawasaki Cornering Management function, quickshifter and more.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The BMW F 900 R is a middleweight naked which has a lot going for it. An attractive price point, proper naked roadster ergonomics and very good performance and dynamics give it a decent attraction. The only downside is it pales in comparison to rivals in its segment which are sharper and more performance-oriented.
