logo
New Delhi

KTM RC 160 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 400 Z Comparison

Compare KTM RC 160 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 400 Z to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on KTM RC 160 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS 400 Z; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.

RC 160 vs Pulsar NS400 Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsRC 160Pulsar NS400
Price1.85 L1.93 L
Power164.2 CC373.0 CC
ClassSportsSports
MileageN/A34.00 KM/L
RC 160
KTM RC 160
*Ex-Showroom Price
1.85 L
Pulsar NS400
Bajaj Pulsar NS400
*Ex-Showroom Price
1.93 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
STD
KTM RC 160
STD
1.85 L
Standard
Bajaj Pulsar NS400
Standard
1.93 L

Overview

Specifications

Engine CC164.2 CC373.0 CC
Max Torque15.5 Nm @ 7500 Rpm35.00
Top Speed118 kmph154 kmph
No. of Gears6 Gears6 Gears
Starting MechanismSelf StartN/A

Features

Pros Cons Bajaj Pulsar NS400

Pros

  • Competitive pricing at Rs 1.85 lakh, making it the most affordable 400cc motorcycle in its segment
  • Impressive performance with a 373cc engine producing 39.4 bhp and 35 Nm of torque
  • Lighter than the Dominar 400 by 18 kg, enhancing acceleration and handling

Cons

  • Design closely resembles the NS200, lacking uniqueness for a flagship model
  • Tyres could be better for improved grip and braking performance
  • Slight vibrations at lower and higher rpm ranges

Verdict

The Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z offers exceptional value for money, packing solid performance and a host of features at a competitive price. While it could benefit from a more distinctive design and better tyres, its power, agility, and affordability make it a strong contender in the 400cc segment. With its potent engine and accessible price, the NS400Z is an appealing option for riders seeking performance on a budget.

Explore Bikes Similar to KTM RC 160

Explore Cars Similar to Bajaj Pulsar NS 400 Z

Recent Popular Bike Comparison In India

Compare Bikes By Body Type

Loading BreadCrumbs...