Compare Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | FZ V3.0 FI | Apache RTR 160 4V | 
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 1.15 L | 
| Power | 149.0 CC | 159.7 CC | 
| Class | Sports | Commuter | 
| Mileage | 45.00 KM/L | 30.00 - 45.00 KM/L | 


| EMI Starting From | ₹3,331/month | ₹3,430/month | 
| User Rating | 8.1 | 8.4 | 
| Design | 8.00 | 8.50 | 
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.50 | 
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 | 
| Significance | 9.00 | 9.00 | 
| Safety | 7.75 | 8.00 | 
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.50 | 
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.50 | 
| Engine CC | 149.0 CC | 159.7 CC | 
| Max Torque | 13.60 | 14.80 | 
| Top Speed | N/A | 114 kmph | 
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears | 
| LED Headlight | Yes | - | 
| LCD Instrument Cluster | Yes | - | 
| ABS | Yes | Yes | 
| Dual Channel ABS | - | No | 
| Day Time Running Light | - | Yes | 
| Engine Cowl | - | Yes | 
| Racing Double Barrel Exhaust | - | Yes | 
| Aggressive Tank Cowl | - | Yes | 
| Aggressive Headlamp | - | Yes | 
| Fully Digital Interactive Speedometer | - | Yes | 
| Roto-Petal Disc Brake | - | Yes | 
| Foam-In-Place Racing Seat | - | Yes | 
| Electronic Fuel Injection System | - | Yes | 
Pros
Cons
Verdict
Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI is a good purchase for anyone looking for a comfortable yet sporty motorycle. Its city oriented dynamics helps, and so does the decent fuel efficiency figures. What doesn't work are the plastics, which certainly could've been improved. Gaps in panels is another issue with motorcycle and stays inconsistent throughtout. The high sticker price makes it difficult to get robust sales.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V BS6 model continues to be one of the best options in the 160cc segment, offering a refined engine and sporty handling. The updates in design and the new headlamp add to its appeal, though the slight drop in power and the absence of advanced features like SmartXonnect might leave some wanting more. Overall, it remains a solid and stylish performer in its class, offering good value for its price.



















































