F1: Hamilton And Leclerc Disqualified In Austin, Here’s Why

- Excessive wear was found on the skid blocks of both drivers, leading to their disqualification, reshaping the race results.
- Safety regulations designed to control ride height and underfloor downforce were violated by the excessive wear on the planks of Hamilton and Leclerc's cars.
- This unusual disqualification highlights the importance of technical compliance and safety in Formula 1, even in the face of fierce competition.
In a shocking turn of events at the 2023 Formula 1 United States Grand Prix, Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc were both disqualified after post-race checks revealed excessive wear on their car planks. This turn of events reshaped the race results and had significant implications for the championship as Lewis Hamilton was attempting to snatch P2 from Sergio Perez.
Also Read: Verstappen Grabs 50th F1 Win In Austin While Hamilton And Leclerc Disqualified
The disqualification was the result of a breach of Article 3.5.9 e) of the 2023 Formula 1 technical regulations. This article stipulates that the thickness of the plank assembly measured normal to the lower surface must be 10mm, with a tolerance of plus or minus 0.2mm. The plank must be uniform when new, and a minimum thickness of 9mm is acceptable due to wear. This regulation is crucial for ensuring safety by controlling ride height and underfloor downforce.
The plank assembly, a 10mm high-density wood laminate, was introduced in 1994 after the tragic events at Imola that led to the deaths of Roland Ratzenberger and Ayrton Senna. It raised the ride height of cars, reducing the underfloor downforce, and was implemented to enhance safety.
In this race, random post-race floor and plank wear checks were conducted on the cars of Hamilton, Leclerc, Max Verstappen, and Lando Norris. While Verstappen and Norris passed these checks, Hamilton and Leclerc were found to be in breach of the regulations.
Hamilton had been particularly competitive during the final stint of the race, closing in on race winner Max Verstappen. Leclerc's one-stop strategy left him vulnerable in the race's closing stages as he fell back to sixth. However, these performances were marred by the discovery of excessive wear on their car planks.
The combined impact of a bumpy track and the unique sprint race schedule significantly contributed to this irregularity. The sprint weekend format imposes parc ferme rules after a single hour of free practice running on Friday afternoon. This format challenges teams' ability to prepare and check their cars adequately, as evident in the excessive plank wear on Hamilton and Leclerc's cars.
Following Hamilton and Leclerc's disqualifications, Lando Norris was promoted to second place, and Carlos Sainz secured the final spot on the podium. Sergio Perez finished fourth, George Russell fifth, and Pierre Gasly in eighth. The disqualifications also had historic implications, with Logan Sargeant becoming the first American to finish in the points since Michael Andretti in 1993.
Also Read: Lewis Hamilton’s 2013 Mercedes-AMG F1 Car Heads To Auction
It is essential to note that the precise impact of running outside the specified plank thickness is challenging to gauge, as it depends on various factors, including the track's condition. Deliberately taking the risk of running too low is illogical as it could lead to disqualification and isn't guaranteed to confer a performance gain.
Hamilton and Leclerc's disqualifications have shown how even the smallest technical breach can alter the course of a Formula 1 race, and safety remains paramount in the sport.
Latest News
Jaiveer Mehra | Apr 24, 2026VW Group Parts Ways With Bugatti: Porsche To Sell Stake In Bugatti-RimacPorsche will sell its stake in both the Rimac Group and the Rimac-Bugatti joint venture to a consortium of buyers lead by venture capital firms HOF Capital & BlueFive Capital.1 min read
Jafar Rizvi | Apr 24, 2026BSA Scrambler 650 vs Gold Star 650: Differences ExplainedBSA has introduced its second motorcycle, built on the 652cc big single platform. It shares a lot of its design and parts with the Gold Star 650. Let's take a look at how different the two motorcycles are.4 mins read
car&bike Team | Apr 24, 2026Hyundai Ioniq V Electric Sedan Concept Unveiled; Gets A Massive 27-inch Panoramic DisplayAt the ongoing Auto China show the Korean carmaker has unveiled the electric sedan as an exclusive model for the China1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Apr 24, 20262026 Range Rover Sport Autobiography Launched At Rs 1.60 CroreThe 2026 Range Rover Sport Autobiography is available in locally assembled and CBU guise.1 min read
car&bike Team | Apr 24, 2026BMW F 450 GS: In PicturesThe F 450 GS has been launched in India, and here is a detailed look at the brand's most affordable adventure motorcycle.3 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Apr 24, 2026Porsche Cayenne Coupe Electric Debuts; Turbo Version Offers 1,156bhp And 669 kmsPorsche Cayenne Coupe Electric revealed at the Auto China 2026. Offers 1,156bhp, 669 km range and 2.5-second time for 0-100kmph sprint.1 min read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Apr 23, 2026Vega Bolt Bluetooth Smart Helmet Review: Smart, Simple, And FunctionalThe Vega Bolt Bluetooth Smart Helmet is a practical take on connected riding gear, aimed at commuters and riders who want integrated functionality without the hassle of add-ons.6 mins read
Preetam Bora | Apr 20, 2026Hero Destini 110 Vs TVS Jupiter 110 Comparison ReviewThe Hero Destini 110 and the TVS Jupiter 110 both sit in the same price bracket and target the same buyer. But they take different approaches. Which 110 cc scooter should you buy?9 mins read
Amaan Ahmed | Apr 15, 2026Kinetic DX+ Review: Pure Nostalgia Can Only Take You So FarNo smoke, no two-stroke – the reborn Kinetic relies heavily on the charm of the original’s design to sway buyers, but can it offer genuine substance to go with the style?12 mins read
Janak Sorap | Apr 10, 2026Triumph 350 Range First Ride Review: More Affordable, More Refined, Still Fun?Triumph’s shift to 350cc aims to cut costs, but does it affect the ride experience?5 mins read
car&bike Team | Apr 7, 2026Flying Flea C6 Review: Royal Enfield’s Electric Gamble?The C6 is the beginning of Royal Enfield's EV journey under the Flying Flea brand. Does it make a strong impression? Read on.8 mins read















































































































