Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | FZ S V3.0 FI | Apache RTR 160 4V |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 1.15 L |
| Power | 149.0 CC | 159.7 CC |
| Class | Sports | Commuter |
| Mileage | 49 KM/L | 30.00 - 45.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹3,364/month | ₹3,430/month |
| User Rating | 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 9.00 | 9.00 |
| Safety | 7.75 | 8.00 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.50 |
| Engine CC | 149.0 CC | 159.7 CC |
| Max Torque | 13.30 | 14.80 |
| Top Speed | 103,115 kmph | 114 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Bluetooth | Yes | - |
| LCD Instrument Cluster | Yes | - |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Channel ABS | - | No |
| Day Time Running Light | - | Yes |
| Engine Cowl | - | Yes |
| Racing Double Barrel Exhaust | - | Yes |
| Aggressive Tank Cowl | - | Yes |
| Aggressive Headlamp | - | Yes |
| Fully Digital Interactive Speedometer | - | Yes |
| Roto-Petal Disc Brake | - | Yes |
| Foam-In-Place Racing Seat | - | Yes |
| Electronic Fuel Injection System | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Yamaha FZ S V 3.0 is an excellent motorcycle for commuting within the city. It is ergonomically balanced and the engine has lots of zeal. Torque offered is ample and the refinement level is commendable with a decent mileage figire. To top it off, Yamaha's reliability is an added bonus. However, it misses out on basic features available with its rivals, and also lacks character in its design. Overall built quality could've been improved.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V BS6 model continues to be one of the best options in the 160cc segment, offering a refined engine and sporty handling. The updates in design and the new headlamp add to its appeal, though the slight drop in power and the absence of advanced features like SmartXonnect might leave some wanting more. Overall, it remains a solid and stylish performer in its class, offering good value for its price.
