Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare 2025 Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on 2025 Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Hunter 350 | Avenger Street 160 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.38 L | 1.12 L |
| Power | 349.0,349.3 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Class | Cruiser | Cruiser |
| Mileage | 36.20 KM/L | 45 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹4,089/month | ₹3,298/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 7.8 |
| Design | 7.50 | |
| Performance | 7.75 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.75 | |
| Significance | 8.00 | |
| Safety | 7.50 | |
| Comfort | 7.75 | |
| Value For Money | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 349.3 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Max Torque | 27.00 | 13.70 |
| Top Speed | 114,130 kmph | 105 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Single Channel ABS | - | No |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 offers a fun, agile, and affordable entry into the world of Royal Enfield. It’s ideal for new riders or those upgrading from smaller bikes, thanks to its light weight, flickability, and accessible price point. While it may lack some modern features and raw power, its retro charm, nimble handling, and overall practicality make it a strong contender for city riding and occasional touring. A great option for those seeking a blend of style, heritage, and urban practicality.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Avenger Street 160 offers an affordable package in a cruiser-like design over what is essentially a commuter motorcycle. Ergonomics are feet forward and the suspension is softly sprung, not so great while going over broken surfaces. While the engine is good enough to potter around the city, the Avenger Street 160 is happiest at speeds under 80 kmph, and that limits its touring capabilities.
