Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | FZ V3.0 FI | Pulsar NS160 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 1.42 L |
| Power | 149.0 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Class | Sports | Commuter |
| Mileage | 45.00 KM/L | 52 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹3,331/month | ₹4,221/month |
| User Rating | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Design | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 9.00 | 8.75 |
| Safety | 7.75 | 7.75 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 149.0 CC | 160.3 CC |
| Max Torque | 13.60 | 14.60 |
| Top Speed | N/A | 120 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| LED Headlight | Yes | - |
| LCD Instrument Cluster | Yes | - |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Pass Light | - | Yes |
| Clear-Lens Indicator Lenses | - | Yes |
| AHO (Automatic Headlamps On) | - | Yes |
| Back-lit Switchgear | - | Yes |
| BSIV Compliant Engine | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
Yamaha FZ V3.0 FI is a good purchase for anyone looking for a comfortable yet sporty motorycle. Its city oriented dynamics helps, and so does the decent fuel efficiency figures. What doesn't work are the plastics, which certainly could've been improved. Gaps in panels is another issue with motorcycle and stays inconsistent throughtout. The high sticker price makes it difficult to get robust sales.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
If you take into account the capable engine, good safety features, stylish appearance and look, comfortable riding experience and overall brand value, this bike does prove to be a value proposition. It is one of the best options for buyers in this segment. The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is a good bike to own, particularly for those seeking the sporty feeling of a roadster and a compelling exhaust and engine note without burning a hole in their pockets.Stiff ride
