Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar NS400Z | Gixxer SF 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.93 L | 1.9 L |
| Power | 373.3 CC | 249.0 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 33.00 KM/L | 38.50 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹5,738/month | ₹5,639/month |
| User Rating | 7.2 | 8.0 |
| Design | 6.00 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 9.00 | 8.00 |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 7.00 | 8.00 |
| Safety | 7.00 | 7.50 |
| Comfort | 7.00 | 8.00 |
| Value For Money | 9.00 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 373.3 CC | 249.0 CC |
| Engine Power | N/A | 26.00 |
| Max Torque | 35 Nm @ 6,500 rpm | 23.00 |
| Top Speed | 157 kmph | N/A |
| No. of Gears | 6 Gears | 6 Gears |
| Valves per Cylinder | N/A | 4 |
| Cooling System | N/A | Oil-cooled |
| Fuel Delivery | N/A | Fuel Injection |
| Instrument Console | - | No |
| Odometer | - | No |
| Speedometer | - | Digital |
| Fuel Gauge | - | Yes |
| Start Mechanism | - | No |
| Hazard Warning Indicator | - | No |
| Stand Indicator | - | No |
| Tripmeter Count | - | Yes |
| Tripmeter Type | - | Digital |
| Tachometer | - | Digital |
| Low Battery Indicator | - | Yes |
| Gear Indicator | - | Yes |
| Low Fuel Indicator | - | Yes |
| Clock | - | No |
| Service Reminder Indicator | - | No |
| Pillion Seat Type | - | No |
| Remote Key | - | No |
| Cruise Control | - | No |
| Dual Channel ABS | - | No |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
In India, it will go up against the likes of the Honda CBR250R, Yamaha Fazer25 and the KTC RC200 and at a price of ₹ 1.71 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi), we believe the Gixxer SF 250 to be a solid purchase in its segment. It looks good, has decent performance and handles quite well too. It sporty enough to be ridden around switchbacks and can handle daily commuting too with equal aplomb. It may have entered a little late to the 250 cc - 400 cc segment but it is definitely a well-rounded package.
