Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare TVS Apache RTR 160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 125 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on TVS Apache RTR 160 vs Bajaj Pulsar 125; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Apache RTR 160 | Pulsar 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.11 L | 79,048 |
| Power | 159.7 CC | 124.4 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 47.00 KM/L | 51 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹3,298/month | ₹2,341/month |
| User Rating | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Design | 7.50 | 8.00 |
| Performance | 7.00 | 7.50 |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 9.00 | 8.75 |
| Safety | 7.00 | 7.75 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Value For Money | 8.50 | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 159.7 CC | 124.4 CC |
| Max Torque | 13.85 Nm @ 7000 Rpm | 10.80 |
| Top Speed | 107 kmph | 99 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Sculpted Digital Display | No | - |
| RTR ENGINE | No | - |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | No | - |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| MUSCLED TANK | No | - |
| CBS | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 160 2V remains a fun and agile motorcycle, especially in urban settings, with a peppy engine and lightweight frame. However, the engine’s age shows with noticeable vibrations at higher speeds, and its softer suspension affects ride quality on rough roads. While it’s still a good option for those looking for a simple, no-nonsense ride, the marginal price difference with the more advanced Apache RTR 160 4V makes the latter a better choice in this segment.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Pulsar 125 has a smooth, refined and decently powerful engine. The excellent ride quality, and impressive stability only enhance its capabilities as a well-rounded commuter motorcycle. The only dampener is that its design looks much too common, and identical to the Pulsar 150 Neon. But that strategy could well work to the Pulsar 125's advantage, boasting of similar engaging performance, similar dimensions as the bigger Pulsar 150, but in a more fuel-efficient package.
