Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar N125 | FZ S V3.0 FI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 85,880 | 1.13 L |
| Power | 124.5 CC | 149.0 CC |
| Class | Sports | Sports |
| Mileage | 57.00 KM/L | 49 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹2,539/month | ₹3,364/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 8.1 |
| Design | 8.00 | |
| Performance | 8.00 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | |
| Significance | 9.00 | |
| Safety | 7.75 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Value For Money | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 124.5 CC | 149.0 CC |
| Max Torque | 11.00 | 13.30 |
| Top Speed | 100 kmph | 103,115 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Bluetooth | - | Yes |
| LCD Instrument Cluster | - | Yes |
| ABS | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Yamaha FZ S V 3.0 is an excellent motorcycle for commuting within the city. It is ergonomically balanced and the engine has lots of zeal. Torque offered is ample and the refinement level is commendable with a decent mileage figire. To top it off, Yamaha's reliability is an added bonus. However, it misses out on basic features available with its rivals, and also lacks character in its design. Overall built quality could've been improved.
