Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 180 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 180; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | Pulsar N160 | Apache RTR 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 1.25 L |
| Power | 164.8 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Class | Commuter | Commuter |
| Mileage | 55 - 59 KM/L | 47.00 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹3,364/month | ₹3,693/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 7.9 |
| Design | 8.00 | |
| Performance | 8.00 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.75 | |
| Significance | 8.00 | |
| Safety | 7.00 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Value For Money | 8.00 |
| Engine CC | 164.8 CC | 177.4 CC |
| Engine Power | 15.70 | N/A |
| Max Torque | 14.65 | 15.50 |
| Top Speed | N/A | 113 kmph |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Cooling System | Oil Cooled | N/A |
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection | N/A |
| USB connectivity | Yes | - |
| Anti-lock braking system (ABS) | - | Yes |
| Roto Petal Disc Brakes | - | Yes |
| Sculpted Digital Display | - | Yes |
| MUSCLED TANK | - | Yes |
| RTR ENGINE | - | Yes |
| Synchronized Stiff Chassis | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 stands out as a refined and well-rounded premium commuter motorcycle in the 160 cc segment. With segment-first features like dual-channel ABS, a smooth engine, and impressive ride quality, it offers great value for everyday riders. While it may not have cutting-edge tech or top-end performance, the Pulsar N160 makes for a compelling choice for those seeking comfort, safety, and reliability in city riding. A solid option in its class.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The TVS Apache RTR 180 offers a comfortable riding position for daily commutes, and in terms of design, has a sporty appeal. However, it could do better with an updated instrument cluster and better brakes. As far as performance is concerned, the RTR 180 offers enjoyable performance for intra-city riding, handles well and has a comfortable ride too. Plus, it is easy to maintain, with economical running costs.
