Loading BreadCrumbs...
Compare Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI vs Bajaj Pulsar 180 to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on Yamaha FZ S V3.0 FI vs Bajaj Pulsar 180; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
| Key Highlights | FZ S V3.0 FI | Pulsar 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 1.13 L | 95,928 |
| Power | 149.0 CC | 178.6 CC |
| Class | Sports | Commuter |
| Mileage | 49 KM/L | 45 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹3,364/month | ₹2,836/month |
| User Rating | 8.1 | N/A |
| Design | 8.00 | |
| Performance | 8.00 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.00 | |
| Significance | 9.00 | |
| Safety | 7.75 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Value For Money | 8.00 |
| Engine Type | Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve | N/A |
| Engine CC | 149.0 CC | 178.6 CC |
| Engine Power | 12.20 | N/A |
| Max Torque | 13.30 | 14.52 |
| Top Speed | 103 kmph | N/A |
| No. of Gears | 5 Gears | 5 Gears |
| Emission Standard | BS6 | N/A |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 | N/A |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | N/A |
| Fuel Delivery | Fuel Injection | N/A |
| Bluetooth | Yes | - |
| LCD Instrument Cluster | Yes | - |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| Tubeless Tyres | - | Yes |
| Sports Telescopic Front Forks Suspension | - | Yes |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Yamaha FZ S V 3.0 is an excellent motorcycle for commuting within the city. It is ergonomically balanced and the engine has lots of zeal. Torque offered is ample and the refinement level is commendable with a decent mileage figire. To top it off, Yamaha's reliability is an added bonus. However, it misses out on basic features available with its rivals, and also lacks character in its design. Overall built quality could've been improved.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
