logo
New Delhi

Honda WR-V vs Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare Honda WR-V vs Skoda Rapid to know which is better. Detailed cars comparison on Honda WR-V vs Skoda Rapid compare price, specs, mileage, performance, reviews and other features on car&bike.

WR-V vs Rapid Comparison Overview

Key HighlightsWR-VRapid
Price9.01 L6.1 L
Power1498 CCN/A
ClassSUVSedan
Mileage18 - 26 KM/LN/A
WR-V
Honda WR-V
*Ex-Showroom Price
9.01 L
Rapid
Skoda Rapid
*Ex-Showroom Price
6.1 L
+
Add
Only Show Differences
S MT Petrol Edge Edition
Honda WR-V
S MT Petrol Edge Edition
9.01 L
Elegance 1.6 MPI AT
Skoda Rapid
Elegance 1.6 MPI AT
6.1 L

Overview

Overall Rating
6.9
8.3
Value For Money7.507.75
Significance7.507.75
Styling7.007.50
Comfort8.009.00
Safety8.008.75
Environment-8.75
Merit Or Usp7.757.75

Specifications

Engine Type4 Cylinder, SOHC I-VTECN/A
Displacement (CC)1199 CCN/A
No. of Cylinders4N/A
Power89 bhp @ 6000 rpmN/A
Torque110 Nm @ 4800 rpmN/A
No. of gears5N/A
Drive TrainFWDN/A
Length3999 mmN/A
Width1734 mmN/A
Height1601 mmN/A
Wheelbase2555 mmN/A
Ground Clearance188 mmN/A
Kerb Weight1104 KGN/A
Boot Space363 LN/A
No. of Doors5N/A
Seating Capacity5N/A
Fuel tank Capacity40.0N/A
Mileage ARAI17.50 KM/LN/A
Front SuspensionMcPherson Strut, Coil SpringN/A
Rear SuspensionTwisted Torsion Beam, Coil SpringN/A
Front Brake TypeDisc (Ventilated)N/A
Rear Brake TypeDrumN/A
Steering TypeElectric Power SteeringN/A
Steering Adjustability1N/A
Wheel TypeAlloy WheelN/A
Tyre TypeTubelessN/A
Front Tyre Size195/60 R16N/A
Rear Tyre Size195/60 R16N/A

Features

Front ACNA No
Rear ACNA No
Third Row AC ZoneNA No
Idle Start/Stop ButtonNA No
Power WindowsNA No
Remote Engine StartNA No
Hands-Free TailgateNA No
Cooled GloveboxNA No
Electric TailgateNA No
Adjustable ORVMsNA No
Adjustable Rear HeadrestsNA No
Wireless Phone ChargerNA No
Central LockingNA No
Driver Seat AdjustmentNA No
Front Passenger Seat AdjustmentNA No
Seat UpholsteryNA No
Folding Rear SeatNA No
Split Rear SeatNA No
Front Seatback PocketsNA No
HeadrestsNA No
Ventilated SeatsNA No
Seat Memory FunctionNA No
ISOFIX Child Seat MountsNA No
No. of AirbagsNA No
Rear Side AirbagNA No
Curtain AirbagNA No
Knee AirbagsNA No
Day & Night Rear View MirrorNA No
Hill Hold ControlNA No
Hill Descent ControlNA No
Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)NA No
Blind Spot MonitoringNA No
Lane AssistNA No
Forward Collision WarningNA No
Auto Emergency BrakingNA No
Driver Drowsiness DetectionNA No
Child Seat Anchor PointsNA No
Parking SensorsNA No
Speed Alert SystemNA No
Parking AssistanceNA No
Speed Sensing Auto Door LockNA No
DashcamNA No
Electric ORVM HeatingNA No
Light TypeHalogen No
Daytime Running Lamps (DRLs)NA No
Fog LampsNA No
Ambient LightingNA No
Automatic High Beam AssistNA No
Follow-Me-Home HeadlampsNA No
Cabin LampsNA No
SunroofNA No
Roof RailsNA No
Shark Fin AntennaNA No
Body-Coloured ORVMsNA No
Chrome AccentsNA No
ORVM AdjustmentsNA No
Rear SpoilerNA No
Skid PlatesNA No
Side StepsNA No
Instrument ClusterNA No
Trip MeterNA No
Average SpeedNA No
ClockNA No
Adjustable Cluster BrightnessNA No
Gear IndicatorNA No
Shift IndicatorNA No
TachometerNA No
Infotainment SystemNA No
Touchscreen Display SizeNA No
Audio SystemNA No
TweetersNA No
SubwooferNA No
Voice CommandsNA No
Smartphone ConnectivityNA No
AUX CompatibilityNA No
Wireless Display (Screen Mirroring)NA No
Heads-Up Display (HUD)NA No
Connected Car TechnologyNA No
Over-The-Air Updates (OTA)NA No
GeofencingNA No
Digital KeyNA No
AI Voice AssistanceNA No
Auto Park AssistNA No
Autonomous Driving LevelNA No
SOS ButtonNA No
Type Battery WarrantyNA No
Type Manufacturer WarrantyNA No

Pros Cons of Honda WR-V

Pros

  • Crossover Styling
  • Spacious Cabin And Boot
  • Peppy And Efficient Diesel Engine

Cons

  • Too Expensive Over Rivals
  • Limited Features
  • Lack Of Road Presence

Verdict

The Honda WR-V, with its array of features and drivability, aligns more closely with a premium hatchback rather than a conventional vehicle in its segment. It amalgamates attributes from various categories, bestowing it with a distinct character. However, despite these merits, there was an opportunity for Honda to further distinguish the WR-V in a crowded market. The potential for additional enhancements or unique offerings might have elevated its appeal and set it apart more definitively from its competitors. This suggests a missed chance to not just blend but lead in its class with more distinctive features or innovations.

Pros Cons of Skoda Rapid

Pros

  • Power-packed engine
  • Impressive handling
  • Ride feels compliant

Cons

  • Rear legroom could have been improved
  • Cabin of the base trim looks dated
  • Sense of space could be improved

Verdict

Skoda has made a strong statement with the new Rapid. It's done away with the diesel engine and that's a bold step. But the renewed focus on introducing more petrol models to the line-up and giving the 4 years Skoda maintenance, assist and warranty package, just gives you a perspective of how the company wants to make the new Rapid a value for money proposition. Yes, it has bargained on features and there's no automatic available yet, but that equation will change in the next couple of months. The Rapid with the 1-litre TSI offers more bang for your buck and is probably the most fun to drive compact sedan out there.

Explore Cars Similar to Honda WR-V

Explore Cars Similar to Skoda Rapid

Popular New Car Comparison

Compare Cars By Body Type

Recent Popular Car Comparison In India

Read More on "Honda WR-V" vs "Skoda Rapid"