Compare Honda WR-V vs Mahindra KUV100 NXT to know which is better. Detailed cars comparison on Honda WR-V vs Mahindra KUV100 NXT compare price, specs, mileage, performance, reviews and other features on car&bike.
| Key Highlights | WR-V | KUV100 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 9.01 L | 4.88 L |
| Power | 1498 CC | 1198 CC |
| Class | SUV | SUV |
| Mileage | 18 - 26 KM/L | 17 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹16,835/month | ₹9,113/month |
| User Rating | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Value For Money | 7.50 | 8.00 |
| Significance | 7.50 | 8.00 |
| Styling | 7.00 | 7.50 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 6.50 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Environment | 7.25 | 6.50 |
| Merit Or Usp | 7.75 | 8.00 |
| Engine Type | 4 Cylinder, SOHC I-VTEC | N/A |
| Displacement (CC) | 1199 CC | N/A |
| No. of Cylinders | 4 | N/A |
| Power | 89 bhp @ 6,000 rpm | N/A |
| Torque | 110 Nm @ 4,800 rpm | N/A |
| No. of gears | 5 | N/A |
| Drive Train | FWD | N/A |
| Air Conditioner | Yes | - |
| Heater | Yes | - |
| Climate Control | No | - |
| Paddle Shift | No | - |
| Cruise Control | No | - |
| Keyless Entry | Yes | - |
| Push Start Stop Button | No | - |
| Steering Mounted Audio | Yes | - |
| Rain Sensing Wipers | No | - |
| Automatic Headlamps | No | - |
| Power Outlets 12V | Yes | - |
| Driver Side Power Door Lock Master Switch | No | - |
| Dust and pollen filter | No | - |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | No | - |
| Coat Hanger | No | - |
| Driver & Passenger Side Vanity Mirror with Lid | No | - |
| Power Adjustable ORVM | No | - |
| All Power Windows with Key Off Time Log | No | - |
| Rear Windshield Defogger | No | - |
| Keyless Entry & Central Door Lock | No | - |
| Front Map Lamp | No | - |
| Illumination Light Adjuster Dial | No | - |
| Fully Foldable Rear Seat | No | - |
| One Touch Lane Change Indicator | No | - |
| Coat Hanger | No | - |
| Footrest | No | - |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | No | - |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Honda WR-V, with its array of features and drivability, aligns more closely with a premium hatchback rather than a conventional vehicle in its segment. It amalgamates attributes from various categories, bestowing it with a distinct character. However, despite these merits, there was an opportunity for Honda to further distinguish the WR-V in a crowded market. The potential for additional enhancements or unique offerings might have elevated its appeal and set it apart more definitively from its competitors. This suggests a missed chance to not just blend but lead in its class with more distinctive features or innovations.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
M&M has facelifted its smallest offering, the KUV 100 and given it as many as 40 changes overall. The KUV 100 NXT is an improvement on the car for sure. But it is still far from being the segment best. It's quirky and does attract with its SUV appeal. Mahindra should see some renewed success with the facelifted car - though should start to think about better connectivity interfaces like Apple CarPlay, Android Auto.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
M&M has facelifted its smallest offering, the KUV 100 and given it as many as 40 changes overall. The KUV 100 NXT is an improvement on the car for sure. But it is still far from being the segment best. It's quirky and does attract with its SUV appeal. Mahindra should see some renewed success with the facelifted car - though should start to think about better connectivity interfaces like Apple CarPlay, Android Auto.
