Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Jaguar F-Type Comparison

    Compare Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Jaguar F-Type to know which is better. Detailed cars comparison on Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs Jaguar F-Type compare price, specs, mileage, performance, reviews and other features on car&bike.
  • Mitsubishi Pajero Sport 2.5 AT vs Jaguar F-Type 2.0 l Coupe BS IV – Which model is Cheapest?

    The ex-showroom price of the Petrol Jaguar F-Type in New Delhi starts at ₹ 98.13 Lakh and goes up to ₹ 2.42 Crore for the fully-loaded Petrol model

    SummaryMitsubishi Pajero Sport 2.5 ATJaguar F-Type 2.0 l Coupe BS IV
    Price₹ 28.28 Lakh₹ 90.93 Lakh
    ManufacturerMitsubishiJaguar
    Body Type
    Mileage13.50 KM/L15.30 KM/L
    Power176 bhp296 bhp
    Engine2477 CC1997 CC
    Fuel TypeDieselPetrol

  • Mitsubishi Pajero Sport 2.5 AT vs Jaguar F-Type 2.0 l Coupe BS IV – Which gives Better Mileage?

    As for the claimed fuel efficiency, the Jaguar F-Type base Petrol engine returns 11 KM/L

  • Mitsubishi Pajero Sport 2.5 AT vs Jaguar F-Type 2.0 l Coupe BS IV – Which has a Better Engine Efficiency?

    In the powertrain department, the Jaguar F-Type gets 3 Petrol 296, 443, 567 bhp engines

129 1478
117 1346
car-icon

EMI

@ 9% for 60 months

52,830/M
1,69,886/M

Expert Rating

N/A
7.8
value for money
significance
styling
comfort
safety
environment
merit or usp
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
0.0 
3.5 
3.5 
8.8 
8.2 
6.8 
6.0 
8.0 

Engine & Performance

Engine Type
Displacement (CC)
No. of Cylinder
Power
Torque
Acceleration 0 to 100 Kmph
No. of gears
Drive Train
2.5L DI-Diesel With Intercooler Turbocharger, 4 Cylinder In-line
2.0 L I4 221 KW Supercharged Auto Engine
2477 CC
1997 CC
4
4
176 bhp @ 4,000 rpm
296 bhp @ 5,500 rpm
350 Nm @ 18,00,-3,500 rpm
400 Nm @ 15,00,-4,500 rpm
N/A
5.7
5
8
2WD
RWD

Dimensions & Weight

Length
Width
Height
Wheelbase
Ground Clearance
Kerb Weight
4695 mm
4482 mm
1815 mm
1923 mm
1840 mm
1311 mm
2800 mm
2622 mm
215 mm
113 mm
1935 KG
1525 KG

Capacity

Boot Space
No. of Doors
Seating Capacity
Fuel tank Capacity
500 L
310 L
5
2
7
2
70.0
63.0

Fuel Efficiency

Mileage ARAI
13.50 KM/L
15.30 KM/L

Suspension Brakes & Steering

Front Suspension
Rear Suspension
Front Brake Type
Rear Brake Type
Steering Type
Steering Adjustability
Double Wishbone Coil Spring With Stabilizer Suspension
Adaptive Damping
3-link Type Coil Spring Suspension
Adaptive Damping
Ventilated Disc
Ventilated Disc
Disc
Ventilated Disc
Hydraulic Power Steering
Electric Power Steering
Yes
Yes

Tyres & Wheels

Wheel Type
Tyre Type
Front Tyre Size
Rear Tyre Size
Alloy Wheels
Alloy Wheels
Tubeless, Radial
Tubeless, Radial
265/65 R17
245/45 R18
265/65 R17
245/45 R18

Comfort & Convenience

Air Conditioner
Heater
Climate Control
Paddle Shift
Cruise Control
Keyless Entry
Push Start Stop Button
Steering Mounted Audio
Rain Sensing Wipers
Automatic Headlamps
Power Outlets 12V
Interactive Driver Display
12-way electric memory front seats
6-way electric front seats
Leather steering wheel
Automatic Climate Control
Automatic Climate Control
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
No
-
No
-
No
-
No

Locks & Security

Engine Immobilizer
Speed Sensing Door Lock
Child Safety Lock
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Seats & Upholstery

Rear Armrest
Front Armrest
Yes
No
Yes
Yes

Safety & Security

Driver Airbags
Passenger Airbags
Side Airbags
ABS
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution
Electronic Stability Program
Hill Assist
Tractional Control
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes

Lights

Automatic Headlamps
Light Type
Turn Indicators on ORVM
Cornering Lights
Premium LED headlights with signature DRL
No
Yes
Projector Halogen
HID Xenon
Yes
Yes
No
No
-
No

Instrumentation

Average Fuel Efficiency Indicator
Low Fuel Warning
Door Ajar Warning
Seat Belt Warning
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Entertainment

Speakers
GPS Navigation
Bluetooth Support
USB Support
Radio
25.40 cm (10) Touch Pro
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
No

Explore Cars Similar to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

Explore Cars Similar to Jaguar F-Type

Popular Comparison