Compare Honda WR-V vs Maruti Suzuki Alto K10 to know which is better. Detailed cars comparison on Honda WR-V vs Maruti Suzuki Alto K10 compare price, specs, mileage, performance, reviews and other features on car&bike.
| Key Highlights | WR-V | Alto K10 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 9.01 L | 3.7 L |
| Power | 1498 CC | 998 CC |
| Class | SUV | Hatchback |
| Mileage | 18 - 26 KM/L | 27 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹16,835/month | ₹6,913/month |
| User Rating | 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Value For Money | 7.50 | 9.20 |
| Significance | 7.50 | 9.20 |
| Styling | 7.00 | 8.20 |
| Comfort | 8.00 | 7.50 |
| Safety | 8.00 | 7.00 |
| Environment | 7.25 | 8.50 |
| Merit Or Usp | 7.75 | 8.40 |
| Engine Type | 4 Cylinder, SOHC I-VTEC | K10C |
| Displacement (CC) | 1199 CC | 998 CC |
| No. of Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Power | 89 bhp @ 6,000 rpm | 66 bhp |
| Torque | 110 Nm @ 4,800 rpm | 89 Nm |
| Top Speed | N/A | 150 |
| Acceleration 0 to 100 Kmph | N/A | 14.0 |
| No. of gears | 5 | 5 |
| Drive Train | FWD | FWD |
| Turbocharger | N/A | No |
| Emissions Standard | N/A | BS6 |
| Air Conditioner | Yes | Manual |
| Front AC | - | Yes |
| Rear AC | - | No |
| Third Row AC Zone | - | No |
| Heater | Yes | No |
| Climate Control | No | No |
| Paddle Shift | No | No |
| Idle Start/Stop Button | - | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Power Windows | - | No |
| Keyless Entry | Yes | No |
| Push Start Stop Button | No | No |
| Remote Engine Start | - | No |
| Hands-Free Tailgate | - | No |
| Steering Mounted Audio | Yes | No |
| Cooled Glovebox | - | No |
| Rain Sensing Wipers | No | No |
| Automatic Headlamps | No | No |
| Electric Tailgate | - | No |
| Adjustable ORVMs | - | No |
| Power Outlets 12V | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless Phone Charger | - | No |
| Driver Side Power Door Lock Master Switch | No | - |
| Dust and pollen filter | No | - |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | No | - |
| Coat Hanger | No | - |
| Driver & Passenger Side Vanity Mirror with Lid | No | - |
| Power Adjustable ORVM | No | - |
| All Power Windows with Key Off Time Log | No | - |
| Rear Windshield Defogger | No | - |
| Keyless Entry & Central Door Lock | No | - |
| Front Map Lamp | No | - |
| Illumination Light Adjuster Dial | No | - |
| Fully Foldable Rear Seat | No | - |
| One Touch Lane Change Indicator | No | - |
| Coat Hanger | No | - |
| Footrest | No | - |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | No | - |
| Rear Combination Lamps | - | No |
| Best-in-Class Mileage | - | No |
| Auto Gear Shift Technology | - | No |
| Speedometer with Exciting Digital Speed Display | - | No |
| Steering-Mounted Audio and Voice Control | - | No |
| Peppy Headlamps | - | No |
| 13''(33.02cm) Wheels with Honeycomb-Themed Covers | - | No |
| Lively and Spacious Interior | - | No |
| Smartplay Studio with Smartphone Navigation | - | No |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Honda WR-V, with its array of features and drivability, aligns more closely with a premium hatchback rather than a conventional vehicle in its segment. It amalgamates attributes from various categories, bestowing it with a distinct character. However, despite these merits, there was an opportunity for Honda to further distinguish the WR-V in a crowded market. The potential for additional enhancements or unique offerings might have elevated its appeal and set it apart more definitively from its competitors. This suggests a missed chance to not just blend but lead in its class with more distinctive features or innovations.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
2022 Maruti Suzuki Alto K10 is a significant improvement over its predecessor, offering better design, tech features, and fuel efficiency. While some of the lower variants lack essential features, the higher trims provide good value for money. Its compact size, efficient engine, and affordability make it a solid choice for first-time car buyers or those seeking a reliable budget car for daily commuting.
