Compare Skoda Kylaq vs Honda WR-V to know which is better. Detailed cars comparison on Skoda Kylaq vs Honda WR-V compare price, specs, mileage, performance, reviews and other features on car&bike.
| Key Highlights | Kylaq | WR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 7.55 L | 9.01 L |
| Power | 999 CC | 1498 CC |
| Class | SUV | SUV |
| Mileage | 18 KM/L | 18 - 26 KM/L |
| EMI Starting From | ₹14,095/month | ₹16,835/month |
| User Rating | N/A | 7.7 |
| Value For Money | 7.50 | |
| Significance | 7.50 | |
| Styling | 7.00 | |
| Comfort | 8.00 | |
| Safety | 8.00 | |
| Environment | 7.25 | |
| Merit Or Usp | 7.75 |
| Engine Type | 1.0-litre TSI Turbo-petrol | 4 Cylinder, SOHC I-VTEC |
| Displacement (CC) | 999 CC | 1199 CC |
| No. of Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Power | 114 bhp @ 50,00,-5,500 rpm | 89 bhp @ 6,000 rpm |
| Torque | 178 Nm @ 17,50,-4,500 rpm | 110 Nm @ 4,800 rpm |
| Acceleration 0 to 100 Kmph | 11.0 | N/A |
| No. of gears | 6 | 5 |
| Drive Train | FWD | FWD |
| Air Conditioner | Auto | Yes |
| Heater | No | Yes |
| Climate Control | No | No |
| Paddle Shift | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Keyless Entry | Yes | Yes |
| Push Start Stop Button | No | No |
| Steering Mounted Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Rain Sensing Wipers | No | No |
| Automatic Headlamps | No | No |
| Power Outlets 12V | Yes | Yes |
| Driver Side Power Door Lock Master Switch | - | No |
| Dust and pollen filter | - | No |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | - | No |
| Coat Hanger | - | No |
| Driver & Passenger Side Vanity Mirror with Lid | - | No |
| Power Adjustable ORVM | - | No |
| All Power Windows with Key Off Time Log | - | No |
| Rear Windshield Defogger | - | No |
| Keyless Entry & Central Door Lock | - | No |
| Front Map Lamp | - | No |
| Illumination Light Adjuster Dial | - | No |
| Fully Foldable Rear Seat | - | No |
| One Touch Lane Change Indicator | - | No |
| Coat Hanger | - | No |
| Footrest | - | No |
| Rear Parcel Shelf (Auto Lift with Tailgate) | - | No |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Honda WR-V, with its array of features and drivability, aligns more closely with a premium hatchback rather than a conventional vehicle in its segment. It amalgamates attributes from various categories, bestowing it with a distinct character. However, despite these merits, there was an opportunity for Honda to further distinguish the WR-V in a crowded market. The potential for additional enhancements or unique offerings might have elevated its appeal and set it apart more definitively from its competitors. This suggests a missed chance to not just blend but lead in its class with more distinctive features or innovations.
