TVS iQube S vs Bajaj Chetak: Comparison Review

Bajaj and TVS! Two storied brands, with rich history and heritage, stepped into the electric two-wheeler segment, almost at the same time! And today, it is time for them, once again, to go head to head. The Bajaj Chetak and the TVS iQube, both these scooters have been in the market for three years now and this is the first time we are pitting them against each other, because these two scooters are traditional rivals in the real sense.
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak: Design
(The Chetak has a nice retro design, with a Vespa-like flavour. It gets excellent fit & finish)
The iQube and the Chetak are poles apart in terms of design and yet look quite handsome. The Bajaj carries a quintessential neo-retro design, with the round LED headlight, curved front apron and the Vespa-esque silhouette and a shapely rear section. The fit and finish on the Chetak is excellent all around, and the scooter looks quite proportionate. The single-sided swingarm at the rear and the trailing link suspension show off the lovely 12-inch alloys.
(The iQube gets a conventional design and is solidly built too)
The iQube on the other hand, is more conventional in its design. Solidly built, the design on the iQube has universal appeal, having a fine balance of form and function.
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak: Features
(The iQube S now gets a 7-inch colour TFT display and it can be controlled by a 5-way joystick on the left switch cube)
There’s a 7-inch colour TFT display on the iQube which is nice and easy to read. The theme changes depending on the mode you ride in. Plus, the display also shows when the scooter goes into regen mode. The controls can be accessed via a 5-way joystick on the left switch cube, which feels intuitive to use. The centre-piece on the Chetak is the circular negative LCD display which shows a decent bit of info but is not the easiest to read, especially in bright daylight.
(The Chetak offers more practicality and a wider, comfier seat, but scores low on features)
Both scooters get Bluetooth and app connectivity, with call alerts, geo-fencing, USB charging port as standard along with full LED lighting and a low-speed reverse gear. The TVS iQube gets turn-by-turn navigation additionally. The Chetak and the iQube get 18 and 17 litres of underseat storage. The Chetak also has an additional cubbyhole on the inside of the front apron. In terms of features, the iQube S edges ahead, and in terms of practicality, the Chetak takes the win!
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak: Performance
(The Chetak offers a nice, comfy ride and looks good on the move)
The Chetak makes more power but the iQube makes more torque. The Chetak has a rated top-speed of just 63 kmph, which may be a little too less for commuting duties, especially in bigger cities, but it makes up in other departments.
(The iQube S feels more planted and is the better handing scooter of the two)
If it is performance that you are looking for straight up then the TVS iQube is a better bet. It has higher top-speed of 78 kmph. It handles better thanks to the telescopic front for and it is lighter at 119 kgs. So if it is speed and performance that you are looking for, then the TVS iQube is a better bet. But if it is comfort that you are looking for and practicality, then the Chetak scores marginally higher in terms of ride quality and comfier ergonomics. Plus, thanks to its metal body, the Chetak weighs 133 kilograms, significantly heavier than the iQube.
(The TVS iQube is also the sprightlier of the two)
The iQube feels more planted at higher speeds and feels lighter on its feet. Both scooters offer decent braking performance, in terms of feel and bite. Both scooters have two riding modes – the Chetak has Eco and Sports while the iQube has Eco and Power.
(The Chetak charges quicker than the TVS)
As far as charging times are concerned, the Chetak takes less time to charge than the iQube. From zero, the Chetak takes about 4 hours to charge fully, while the TVS takes up to 4 hours 30 minutes to charge fully with a 650-watt charger.
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak: Prices and Verdict
| Prices | Bajaj Chetak Premium | TVS iQube S |
|---|---|---|
| (ex-Showroom, Delhi) | Rs. 1,51,958 | Rs. 92,976 |
| (On-road, Delhi) | Rs. 1,57,943 | Rs. 1,09,256 |
Bajaj says that the Chetak is doing really well in rural and semi-urban areas, that’s because the brand, the name ‘Chetak’, still has a lot of pull. It is a beautifully crafted scooter, it looks really good, is well finished is proportionate and is comfortable and practical as well. But the footprint of the Chetak is not as widespread as the TVS iQube. So, the winner of this comparison has to be the TVS iQube because if you are looking for performance and features, the TVS iQube makes a lot of sense. Plus, the big deciding factor is the fact that this is priced at Rs. 1.10 lakh (on-road, Delhi) while that is priced at Rs. 1.58 lakh (on-road, Delhi). So, there’s a huge price difference and yes, the TVS iQube comes across as a more well-rounded package.
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak: Specifications
| Specifications | Bajaj Chetak | TVS iQube S |
|---|---|---|
| Motor (Hub Mounted) | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor | Brushless DC Motor |
| Battery | Lithium Ion Battery (2.884 kWh) | Lithium-Ion Battery (3.04 kWh) |
| Max Power | 3.8 kW | 3 kW |
| Peak Torque | 20 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Gearbox | Single-speed Constant Mesh | Automatic |
| Front Suspension | Trailing Link | Telescopic |
| Rear Suspension | Monoshock | Adjustable Twin Shock Absorbers |
| Ground Clearance | 145 mm | 157 mm |
| Real World Range | 90 km (Eco Mode) 80 km (Sports Mode) | 100 km (Eco Mode) 75 km (Power Mode) |
| Weight | 133 kg | 118.8 kg |
| Top Speed | 63 kmph | 78 kmph |
| Underseat storage | 18 litres | 17 litres |
| Charging Time | 4 hours | 4 hours 30 mins (10-80%) |
Latest News
car&bike Team | May 1, 2026India’s First Barrier-Free Tolling System Inaugurated In GujaratThe system has been installed at the Chorayasi Toll Plaza on the Surat to Bharuch section of NH-48.1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | May 1, 2026Auto Sales April 2026: Hyundai, Tata, Mahindra, Kia Start New FY On Positive NoteHyundai reported its best-ever sales for April 2026, but still lagged behind Tata and Mahindra, who continued to hold second and third place.4 mins read
car&bike Team | Apr 30, 2026Bajaj Pulsar NS400z Price Slashed By Rs 14,000The updated 349 cc Puslar NS400z is now priced at Rs 1.80 lakh (ex-showroom).1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Apr 30, 2026Oben Rorr Evo Launched At Rs 1 LakhIntroductory prices are valid for the first 10,000 units, following which prices will be hiked by Rs 25,000.2 mins read- Bilal Firfiray | Apr 30, 2026Ferrari Purosangue Handling Speciale Revealed With New Active SuspensionFerrari’s first four-door, four-seater gets a special handling package with active suspension to make it more dynamic to drive.1 min read
car&bike Team | Apr 30, 2026Royal Enfield Is Testing E85-Ready Classic 350 - Spy PhotosThe test bike was spied on public roads just days after the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways released a draft notification for E85 and E100 ethanol blending.1 min read
Jafar Rizvi | May 3, 2026River Indie Gen 3 Long Term Report: 1 Month, 400 km AfterAfter a month and 400 km, the River Indie impresses with its utility-first approach, smooth ride and standout design, despite a few everyday usability compromises.8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | May 2, 2026Volkswagen Taigun Facelift Review: Still The Driver’s SUV, But Improved!The updated Volkswagen Taigun gets a new 8-speed automatic, a refreshed design, and added features. But does it still deliver the best driving experience in the C-SUV segment?5 mins read
Shams Raza Naqvi | Apr 29, 2026Toyota Innova Hycross Vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Choosing The Right Three Row Family MoverIn a battle of three-row cars the electric Mahindra XEV 9S takes on the Toyota Innova Hycross. Which one ticks more boxes?1 min read
Janak Sorap | Apr 26, 2026BMW F 450 GS First Ride Review: Almost A Proper GS With Big Bike DNANew 420cc twin, premium build, feature-loaded and Easy Ride Clutch — but does it deliver where it truly matters?8 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Apr 25, 20262026 MG Majestor Review: Bold, Feature-Packed And Off-Road ReadyWe spent time with the MG Majestor to see how much of an improvement it is over the Gloster, and whether it can take on the segment leader – Toyota Fortuner.9 mins read













































































































