Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi to Run Its Course Till January 15 as Planned
car&bike Team
1 min read
Jan 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
The Delhi High Court said on Monday that the AAP government's odd-even vehicle scheme to control rising air pollution in the capital city will continue till January 15 as planned.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
Bilal Firfiray | Feb 12, 2026MG Majestor vs MG Gloster: What’s New, What’s Different?MG Majestor replaces the Gloster as MG’s new flagship SUV for 2026. Here’s a detailed comparison between the two.4 mins read
car&bike Team | Feb 12, 20262026 MG Majestor: Variants, Features, Specifications ExplainedThe Majestor will be offered in two key trim levels including Sharp and Savvy and in both two-wheel and four-wheel drive variants.2 mins read
car&bike Team | Feb 12, 20262026 MG Majestor SUV: In PicturesAlong with the new positioning, the SUV features a heavily updated design and styling; here’s a detailed look at it in pictures.1 min read
car&bike Team | Feb 12, 2026Tata Punch EV Facelift Spotted Ahead Of February 20 LaunchThe Punch EV facelift appears to be identical to the ICE counterpart.4 mins read
Amaan Ahmed | Feb 12, 2026MG Majestor SUV Unveiled In India Ahead Of April 2026 LaunchReplacing the Gloster in the lineup, the Majestor will be the new MG flagship SUV in India, and deliveries will begin in the month of May.1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Feb 12, 2026Mahindra Eyes Increasing Production Capacity Of ICE & Electric SUVs By Up To 7,000 Units Per Month By Q2 FY2027Carmaker said that currently models such as the Bolero, Bolero Neo and XUV 3XO are being manufactured at peak capacity.3 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Feb 12, 2026BMW X3 30 xDrive M Sport Review: The Driver’s SUV ReturnsRange-toppingX3 30 xDrive M Sport brings back the fun with 255bhp and genuine enthusiast appeal. Does this performance-focused SUV stand out?5 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Feb 11, 2026Mercedes-AMG CLE 53 Coupe Review: The Goldilocks AMG?The Mercedes-AMG CLE 53 Coupe is a concoction of hooliganistic performance and everyday usability. Here’s why this Rs 1.5 crore two-door AMG might be the perfect modern sports coupe for India.6 mins read
Girish Karkera | Feb 11, 2026Toyota Ebella EV Review: Compact And Fun-To-Drive With The Promise Of Stress-Free AftersalesNo hiding the fact that it is a clone of the Maruti Suzuki eVitara, but the first all-electric Toyota in India is reasonably well-rounded8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Feb 10, 2026Tata Punch EV Long Term Review: Small EV With A Big-Hearted PersonalityWith the new Punch EV Facelift just around the corner, we decided to take a look at what it excels at and what could be improved.7 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Feb 4, 2026Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Review: Sensible Flagship For IndiaVolkswagen has introduced a made-in-India flagship SUV that offers space, comfort, performance, and German driving finesse in a practical three-row package. But is the Tayron R-Line good enough?6 mins read