Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi to Run Its Course Till January 15 as Planned
car&bike Team
1 min read
Jan 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
The Delhi High Court said on Monday that the AAP government's odd-even vehicle scheme to control rising air pollution in the capital city will continue till January 15 as planned.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
Jaiveer Mehra | May 16, 2026Volkswagen ID.Polo GTI Revealed; 223 bhp Hot Hatch First EV To Wear GTI BadgeThe ID.Polo GTI is offered with a 52 kWh battery, offering up to 424 km of range, and has a sub-7-second 0-100 kmph sprint time.1 min read
car&bike Team | May 15, 2026Norton Manx R's Made-in-India V4 Engine: All You Need To KnowThe 1,200cc, 72-degree V4 engine of the Norton Manx R is perhaps the most sophisticated and powerful motorcycle engine built in India.1 min read
car&bike Team | May 15, 2026Norton Atlas To Be Fully Built In India Before LaunchThe Norton Atlas and Atlas GT will be the mid-size adventure touring models, which will be the first Norton models to be completely manufactured in India.1 min read
Hansaj Kukreti | May 15, 2026King's New Ride: Shah Rukh Khan Adds Rs 5 Crore American SUV Cadillac Escalade To His GarageBollywood star Shah Rukh Khan was recently spotted on the streets of Mumbai being driven around in a luxurious full-size SUV, and videos of the car have gone viral across social media.1 min read
car&bike Team | May 15, 2026Defender Leads JLR Volumes In India As Overall Sales Decline In FY26The brand has recorded a 14 per cent revenue growth, with the Range Rover, Range Rover Sport and Defender being the most popular models1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | May 15, 2026Tata Sierra EV Launch Confirmed For July-September Quarter; 2 New Nameplates Coming In 2026The launches in 2026 are expected to include the Punch & Punch EV facelifts with the Sierra EV and the Avinya EV expected to be the all-new nameplates.3 mins read
Preetam Bora | May 11, 20262026 Suzuki Burgman Street 125 Review: What’s Good, What’s Not?The new Suzuki Burgman Street 125 gets refreshed design, minor but meaningful tweaks to the engine, a stiffened chassis, new features and more. But is it worth recommending? Read on, to find out.8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | May 11, 2026Audi SQ8 Review: The Performance SUV That Actually Makes SenseThe Audi SQ8 has the performance of a V8 seamlessly combined with the everyday luxury and comfort, making it one of the most complete performance SUVs on sale in India today.5 mins read
Jafar Rizvi | May 3, 2026River Indie Gen 3 Long Term Report: 1 Month, 400 km AfterAfter a month and 400 km, the River Indie impresses with its utility-first approach, smooth ride and standout design, despite a few everyday usability compromises.8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | May 2, 2026Volkswagen Taigun Facelift Review: Still The Driver’s SUV, But Improved!The updated Volkswagen Taigun gets a new 8-speed automatic, a refreshed design, and added features. But does it still deliver the best driving experience in the C-SUV segment?5 mins read
Shams Raza Naqvi | Apr 29, 2026Toyota Innova Hycross Vs Mahindra XEV 9S: Choosing The Right Three Row Family MoverIn a battle of three-row cars the electric Mahindra XEV 9S takes on the Toyota Innova Hycross. Which one ticks more boxes?1 min read