Odd-Even Scheme in Delhi to Run Its Course Till January 15 as Planned
car&bike Team
1 min read
Jan 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
The Delhi High Court said on Monday that the AAP government's odd-even vehicle scheme to control rising air pollution in the capital city will continue till January 15 as planned.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
The court said it would "not interfere with the notification" that allows only cars with odd-numbered licence plates on Delhi's roads on odd-numbered dates, and those with even-numbered plates on the other days till this Friday.
The court, however, directed the government to take into consideration the contents of the petitions, which had challenged the government's scheme, before taking any further action.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said, though the implementation of the scheme may have caused hardship to a section of society, "power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine correctness of such policy decision".
"Keeping in view that restrictions under notification are only for a limited period of 15 days and it is stated that the scheme has been enforced as a pilot project to ascertain the reduction, if any, of pollution levels, we are of the view that interference by this court is not warranted," it said.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula to Keep Nearly 10 Lakh Private Vehicles Off the Road in Delhi
The court also said in its 12-page order, "Implementation may have caused hardship to a section of the society, however, the power of judicial review cannot be extended to determine the correctness of such a policy decision or to find out whether there could be more appropriate or better alternatives.
"It's neither within domain of the courts nor the scope of judicial review to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise or whether a better public policy can be evolved as suggested by petitioners," the bench added.
Also Read - Odd-Even Formula: The Exemptions
It also observed that "law is well settled that on matters affecting policy, courts will not interfere unless the policy is unconstitutional or contrary to statutory provisions or arbitrary or irrational or in abuse of power."
"Since, the policy decisions are taken based on expert knowledge of the persons concerned, courts are normally not equipped to question the correctness of a policy decision," the bench said.
On January 8, the High Court had reserved its order on the pleas challenging the scheme after the Delhi government defended its stand on the issue, saying per capita toxic gas emission had declined due to lesser number of cars on city roads.
Also Read - Odd-Even Rule: Violators Will Not Be Allowed to Park in Delhi
The High Court had earlier questioned the impact of the odd-even operation on pollution and asked the AAP government to consider restricting the programme, slated for a fortnight till January 15, to a week.
The court's order came on a bunch of petitions filed by various individuals, including lawyers, who had challenged the AAP government's December 28, 2015 notification to impose the scheme.
The petitions had contended that the AAP government carried out a pick-and-choose policy against car owners, whereas 46 per cent pollution was caused by trucks.
Delhi High Court Bar Association President Rajiv Khosla, one of the petitioners, said the data submitted by the city government was not correct and the particulate matter across the capital showed a rising trend despite the scheme being in place since January 1.
Defending the scheme, the government had said it aimed at reducing congestion on the capital's roads that has further contributed towards lowering of pollution.
The AAP government has contended that particulate and nitrogen-oxide load from cars have come down during the odd-even programme by as much as 40 per cent and there have been benefits due to the reduction in the number of diesel cars.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
car&bike Team | Jul 1, 2026BYD eMax 7 Comfort Launched At Rs 27.90 LakhNew mid variant slots in between the Premium and Superior trim and comes with the 71.8 kWh battery.1 min read
car&bike Team | Jul 1, 2026BYD Cars Prices Hiked By Up To Rs 1 LakhBYD India has revised prices across select variants in its electric passenger vehicle line-up, with increases ranging from Rs 50,000 to Rs 1 lakh.1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Jul 1, 2026Fifth-Gen BMW X5 Debuts With ICE, Hybrid, EV & FCEV PowertrainsNew X5 adopts the ‘Neue Klasse’ design from the smaller X3 while offering a wide range of powertrain options.1 min read
Jafar Rizvi | Jul 1, 2026Lamborghini Urus SE Performante Revealed As Brand’s Most Powerful SUV YetPacking 801 bhp and a 0-100 kmph time of 3.3 seconds, it is the quickest and most powerful Urus to date.3 mins read
car&bike Team | Jul 1, 2026Ather 450X Overtones Series Launched; Gets Faster Charging & New ColoursThe 450X Overtones series features three new colours, a new 900W charger as well as the updated Atherstack 7 software platform, which unlocks new features.1 min read
car&bike Team | Jul 1, 2026VIDA Reveals New Brand Logo, Enters Asia Book of RecordsHero MotoCorp's EV arm, VIDA, has introduced a redesigned logo that reflects its expanding electric mobility ambitions.1 min read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Jun 29, 2026Renault Kiger vs Toyota Urban Cruiser Taisor: Which Underdog Deserves Your Money?Both the Kiger and the Taisor promise strong performance, solid features, comfortable cabins and everyday usability, all without breaking the bank. But which of these underrated subcompact SUVs deserves your money? Let's find out.1 min read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Jun 29, 2026Skoda Kodiaq RS Review: The Best Kodiaq Yet?The Skoda Kodiaq RS is finally here, and it's every bit as exciting as I expected. But was it worth the wait?7 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Jun 28, 2026BMW X6 M60i Review: It’s Back And HOW!The BMW X6 M60i blends a 530bhp twin-turbo V8, with its unmistakable coupe-SUV styling. There’s plenty of character, but is it worth your money?6 mins read
Janak Sorap | Jun 25, 2026350cc Bajaj Dominar 400 Review: Same Character, Lower PriceA slightly lower displacement engine, a significantly lower price tag and nearly the same performance — the Bajaj Dominar 400 aims to be smarter rather than faster.6 mins read
Preetam Bora | Jun 25, 20262026 Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z First Ride Review: Smaller Engine, But Should You Buy It?The Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z won our Two-Wheeler Upgrade of the Year. Then new tax slabs happened. Smaller engine, same badge – but does it still deliver?6 mins read