Bajaj Auto Issues Statement Over TVS Advertisement Dispute
Sameer Contractor
1 min read
Jul 05, 2016, 09:47 PM

Key Highlights
- Bajaj says its ad mentions results recieved in real world driving cycle
- The Madras HC has ordered Bajaj to temporarily stop running the ad
- The High Court has given Bajaj 2 Weeks to file a detailed response
After TVS Motor Company took Bajaj Auto to court over its disparaging advertisement campaign for the CT100B against the XL 100, the Pune based bike maker has issued a press release clearing its stance in the entire issue of false representation of fuel economy figures. Responding the dispute, Bajaj said that the fuel efficiency figures mentioned in the advert are based on the Indian Driving Cycle (IDC) tests and were made after taking 'relevant customer feedback'.
TVS filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court last week over Bajaj Auto's advertisement campaign that compares the TVS XL100 with the CT100B. The Hosur based bike maker claimed that the advert showcased false economy figures and the complete sales promotion was intended to disparage their product. As a result, the Madras high court directed Bajaj to stop running the ad campaign for a period of two weeks, and has permitted the company to file a detailed response during the said period about the matter.
Explaining its position, Bajaj Auto mentions that customers at large associate better with fuel efficiency in the real world, instead of the results based on lab conditions. The company further states that under IDC test conditions, the Bajaj CT100B delivered a real-time fuel efficiency of 99 kmpl, whereas the TVS XL100 returned a fuel economy figure of 67 kmpl, as claimed by the company's website. After taking customer feedback, the Pulsar maker deployed the promotional campaign comparing both models, which clearly hasn't gone down well with TVS. Bajaj has defended its ad campaign stating it was merely a reflection of the customers experience as disclosed to the company and were neither discouraging or denigrating to the TVS moped.
Bajaj Auto introduced the CT100B last year and the entry-level motorcycle has gained quite the popularity in rural markets. The company mentioned in its statement that the bike maker garnered 35 per cent national market share in the entry-level motorcycle segment, while the bike managed to achieve 52 per cent market share in Tamil Nadu alone between the April to December 2015 period.
The law allows manufacturers to slightly exaggerate their advertisements in order to make the product more sale-able. However, companies should never denigrate competitor products. The court allows comparative advertisements to run as long as they do not have a negative overtone.
Incidentally, this isn't the first time TVS and Bajaj have had a scuffle. Previously, it was Bajaj Auto that took TVS to court back in 2008, stating that the latter had used the bike maker's DTS-i technology on its two-wheelers. The case however, was ruled into TVS' favour back in 2009.
TVS filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court last week over Bajaj Auto's advertisement campaign that compares the TVS XL100 with the CT100B. The Hosur based bike maker claimed that the advert showcased false economy figures and the complete sales promotion was intended to disparage their product. As a result, the Madras high court directed Bajaj to stop running the ad campaign for a period of two weeks, and has permitted the company to file a detailed response during the said period about the matter.
Explaining its position, Bajaj Auto mentions that customers at large associate better with fuel efficiency in the real world, instead of the results based on lab conditions. The company further states that under IDC test conditions, the Bajaj CT100B delivered a real-time fuel efficiency of 99 kmpl, whereas the TVS XL100 returned a fuel economy figure of 67 kmpl, as claimed by the company's website. After taking customer feedback, the Pulsar maker deployed the promotional campaign comparing both models, which clearly hasn't gone down well with TVS. Bajaj has defended its ad campaign stating it was merely a reflection of the customers experience as disclosed to the company and were neither discouraging or denigrating to the TVS moped.

Bajaj CT 100
The law allows manufacturers to slightly exaggerate their advertisements in order to make the product more sale-able. However, companies should never denigrate competitor products. The court allows comparative advertisements to run as long as they do not have a negative overtone.
Incidentally, this isn't the first time TVS and Bajaj have had a scuffle. Previously, it was Bajaj Auto that took TVS to court back in 2008, stating that the latter had used the bike maker's DTS-i technology on its two-wheelers. The case however, was ruled into TVS' favour back in 2009.
Latest News
Jafar Rizvi | Aug 15, 2026Mahindra Scorpio Lifestyler Production vs Concept: What Has Changed?The Scorpio Lifestyler may look familiar, but Mahindra has made several changes in taking the Global Pik-Up from concept to production.3 mins read
Sarthak Mahajan | Aug 15, 2026Mahindra BE 6 Sporteq: In PicturesBE 6 Sporteq is also offered in two special editions: BE 6 Launch Edition and BE 6 Sporteq Formula E Freedom Edition.1 min read
Sarthak Mahajan | Aug 15, 2026Mahindra Scorpio Lifestyler Pick-Up: In PicturesNamed the Lifestyler in international markets, the Scorpio Lifestyler is based on the Scorpio N sold in India.3 mins read
car&bike Team | Aug 15, 2026Mahindra BE 6 Sporteq Launched At Rs 19.45 LakhBE 6 Sporteq replaces the outgoing standard BE 6 and gets a new 70 kWh battery pack option.2 mins read
car&bike Team | Aug 15, 2026Mahindra BE 6 Sporteq Formula E Freedom Edition Launched At Rs 24.45 LakhThe BE 6 Formula E Freedom Edition ditches the erstwhile design elements and is now in line with the standard model.2 mins read
Jaiveer Mehra | Aug 14, 2026Mahindra Scorpio Lifestyler Pick-Up Makes Global Debut; India Launch In 2027The Scorpio Lifestyler, just Lifestyler in international markets, is the production-ready variant of the Global Pik-Up Concept unveiled in 2023.3 mins read
Preetam Bora | Aug 12, 2026Royal Enfield Himalayan 440 Custom Review: Beating RE to the PunchDelhi-based custom motorcycle shop TNT Motorcycles introduces packages to convert existing Himalayan 411 adventure bikes to Himalayan 440. Is it worth the expense?8 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Aug 11, 20262026 Nissan Tekton 700 km Review: Can It Conquer The Himalayas?We drove the newly launched Nissan Tekton from Chandigarh all the way up to Leh, covering over 700 km with the new SUV. From exploring the Tekton’s capabilities in the Himalayas to setting an India Book Record, here’s how the trip unfolded.8 mins read
Preetam Bora | Aug 11, 20262026 Aprilia Tuono 457 Special Edition First Ride Review: Should You Buy It?The 2026 Aprilia Tuono 457 delivers an engaging, everyday riding experience with strong performance. At its price point, the Tuono 457 is a brilliant motorcycle, but not quite the complete package. Why is that, and should you still buy it? Read on.8 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Aug 1, 2026Toyota Hilux Review: The InvincibleMarking it as the ninth generation, the Hilux comes with a major cosmetic overhaul. But is it still relevant enough for the current times or is it getting too long in the tooth?5 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Jul 30, 2026Kia Syros EV Review: Best EV To Buy Under Rs 20 Lakh?The Kia Syros EV comes into the game with a modern design, spacious cabin, strong performance, decent range and an aggressive pricing. But could it become the new benchmark under Rs 20 lakh?5 mins read














































































































