Bajaj Auto Issues Statement Over TVS Advertisement Dispute
Sameer Contractor
1 min read
Jul 05, 2016, 09:47 PM
Key Highlights
- Bajaj says its ad mentions results recieved in real world driving cycle
- The Madras HC has ordered Bajaj to temporarily stop running the ad
- The High Court has given Bajaj 2 Weeks to file a detailed response
After TVS Motor Company took Bajaj Auto to court over its disparaging advertisement campaign for the CT100B against the XL 100, the Pune based bike maker has issued a press release clearing its stance in the entire issue of false representation of fuel economy figures. Responding the dispute, Bajaj said that the fuel efficiency figures mentioned in the advert are based on the Indian Driving Cycle (IDC) tests and were made after taking 'relevant customer feedback'.
TVS filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court last week over Bajaj Auto's advertisement campaign that compares the TVS XL100 with the CT100B. The Hosur based bike maker claimed that the advert showcased false economy figures and the complete sales promotion was intended to disparage their product. As a result, the Madras high court directed Bajaj to stop running the ad campaign for a period of two weeks, and has permitted the company to file a detailed response during the said period about the matter.
Explaining its position, Bajaj Auto mentions that customers at large associate better with fuel efficiency in the real world, instead of the results based on lab conditions. The company further states that under IDC test conditions, the Bajaj CT100B delivered a real-time fuel efficiency of 99 kmpl, whereas the TVS XL100 returned a fuel economy figure of 67 kmpl, as claimed by the company's website. After taking customer feedback, the Pulsar maker deployed the promotional campaign comparing both models, which clearly hasn't gone down well with TVS. Bajaj has defended its ad campaign stating it was merely a reflection of the customers experience as disclosed to the company and were neither discouraging or denigrating to the TVS moped.
Bajaj Auto introduced the CT100B last year and the entry-level motorcycle has gained quite the popularity in rural markets. The company mentioned in its statement that the bike maker garnered 35 per cent national market share in the entry-level motorcycle segment, while the bike managed to achieve 52 per cent market share in Tamil Nadu alone between the April to December 2015 period.
The law allows manufacturers to slightly exaggerate their advertisements in order to make the product more sale-able. However, companies should never denigrate competitor products. The court allows comparative advertisements to run as long as they do not have a negative overtone.
Incidentally, this isn't the first time TVS and Bajaj have had a scuffle. Previously, it was Bajaj Auto that took TVS to court back in 2008, stating that the latter had used the bike maker's DTS-i technology on its two-wheelers. The case however, was ruled into TVS' favour back in 2009.
TVS filed a civil suit in the Madras High Court last week over Bajaj Auto's advertisement campaign that compares the TVS XL100 with the CT100B. The Hosur based bike maker claimed that the advert showcased false economy figures and the complete sales promotion was intended to disparage their product. As a result, the Madras high court directed Bajaj to stop running the ad campaign for a period of two weeks, and has permitted the company to file a detailed response during the said period about the matter.
Explaining its position, Bajaj Auto mentions that customers at large associate better with fuel efficiency in the real world, instead of the results based on lab conditions. The company further states that under IDC test conditions, the Bajaj CT100B delivered a real-time fuel efficiency of 99 kmpl, whereas the TVS XL100 returned a fuel economy figure of 67 kmpl, as claimed by the company's website. After taking customer feedback, the Pulsar maker deployed the promotional campaign comparing both models, which clearly hasn't gone down well with TVS. Bajaj has defended its ad campaign stating it was merely a reflection of the customers experience as disclosed to the company and were neither discouraging or denigrating to the TVS moped.
Bajaj CT 100
The law allows manufacturers to slightly exaggerate their advertisements in order to make the product more sale-able. However, companies should never denigrate competitor products. The court allows comparative advertisements to run as long as they do not have a negative overtone.
Incidentally, this isn't the first time TVS and Bajaj have had a scuffle. Previously, it was Bajaj Auto that took TVS to court back in 2008, stating that the latter had used the bike maker's DTS-i technology on its two-wheelers. The case however, was ruled into TVS' favour back in 2009.
Related News
Latest Cars
Upcoming Cars
Latest News
Hansaj Kukreti | Jan 2, 2026BYD Sealion 7 Electric SUV Price Hiked By Rs 50,000BYD has increased the price of the Sealion 7 Premium by ₹50,000, effective January 1, 2026, taking it to ₹49.40 lakh; pricing for the Performance variant remains unchanged at ₹54.9 lakh, while existing bookings made before December 31, 2025, will retain the old price.1 min read
Janak Sorap | Jan 2, 2026Kawasaki Z1100 Fully Booked for 2026All 20 units of the Kawasaki Z1100 allocated for 2026 are fully reserved. Next bookings batch haven’t been announced yet.1 min read
Preetam Bora | Jan 2, 2026Ducati Panigale V4 R Launched In India At Rs. 84.99 LakhThe Ducati Panigale V4 R is a road-legal superbike, a version of Ducati’s WSBK contender that sits between the Panigale V4 S and Ducati’s MotoGP machines.1 min read
car&bike Team | Jan 2, 2026Two-Wheeler Sales December 2025: Most Brands Report Sustained GrowthIn the last month of 2025, most two-wheeler manufacturers reported strong growth numbers.1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Jan 2, 2026New Kia Seltos vs Tata Sierra: Pricing ComparedKia has come out all guns blazing with the second-gen Seltos, with prices starting barely Rs 20,000 higher than the outgoing model. But how does it compare to the other newcomer in the segment, the Tata Sierra?5 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Jan 2, 2026BYD Records 4.6 Million Global Sales in 2025; EV Deliveries of 2.26 Million Could Top TeslaBYD hit 4.6 million sales in 2025 but saw its slowest growth in 5 years. Overseas deliveries crossed 1 million, while 2.26 million EV sales could push it past Tesla for the first time.2 mins read
Preetam Bora | Dec 30, 2025TVS Orbiter Review: Real-World Performance and Range TestedThe TVS Orbiter is a promising electric scooter promising decent range, practicality and pricing. But is there any reason to avoid it? We spent a few days getting to know it better.9 mins read
Jafar Rizvi | Dec 24, 2025MG Windsor EV 38 kWh Long-Term Report: IntroductionThe Windsor EV has joined our garage, and before it settles into daily duty, I took it out to get a sense of what living with an electric car is like.4 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Dec 23, 20252026 Kia Seltos Review: Formula Is Spot On, But Is The Timing Right?The 2nd-gen Kia Seltos has arrived, but it has the challenge of facing strong rivals like the Victoris and Sierra. The question is simple - Does it still have what it takes?9 mins read
car&bike Team | Dec 26, 2025Tata Punch EV Long-Term Second Report: Highway Performance, Pros & ConsAfter a week of living with the Tata Punch EV Long Range—including a proper Mumbai-Nashik highway test—we've learned what this little electric SUV is really made of.1 min read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Dec 22, 20252026 Tata Harrier & Safari 1.5 Hyperion Review: By The Power Of Petrol!The new Tata Harrier and Safari petrol packs a new 1.5-litre TGDI Hyperion engine, but is it an ideal alternative to the diesel version?7 mins read