Trump Administration Freezing Fuel Efficiency Penalties In The US

The Trump administration said late on Friday it was issuing final rules to suspend a 2016 Obama administration regulation that more than doubled penalties for automakers failing to meet fuel efficiency requirements. Congress in 2015 ordered federal agencies to adjust a wide range of civil penalties to account for inflation and, in response, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under President Barack Obama issued rules to eventually raise fines to $14 from $5.50 for every 0.1 mile per gallon of fuel that new cars and trucks consume in excess of the required standards.
Automakers protested the hike, saying it could increase industry compliance costs by $1 billion annually. After a group of states and environmental groups filed suit, the Trump administration began the process of formally undoing the Obama regulation and first proposed the freeze in 2018.
In a statement late on Friday, NHTSA said it was faithfully following the intent of Congress to ensure the penalty rate was set at the level required by statute.
It expected this final rule to significantly cut the future burden on industry and consumers by up to $1 billion a year, it added.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing General Motors Co (GM.N), Volkswagen AG (VOWG_p.DE), Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T), Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (FCHA.MI) and others, had said it could increase industry compliance costs by $1 billion annually.
Late on Friday, Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the group, praised the decision, saying NHTSA's "own model clearly shows the significant economic harm that such a dramatic and unjustified increase in penalties would have on auto manufacturers, workers, and ultimately consumers."
The prior administration had "failed to take into account the significant economic harm that would result," she added.
Automakers argued the increases would dramatically raise costs, since they would also boost the value of fuel economy credits that are used to meet requirements.
In September 2017, three environmental groups and some U.S. states including New York and California sued NHTSA for putting the Obama rules on hold.
Last year, the states said, "If the penalty is not sufficiently high, automakers lack a vital incentive to manufacture fuel-efficient vehicles."
Some automakers historically have paid fines instead of meeting fuel efficiency requirements - including some luxury automakers like Jaguar Land Rover, owned by India's Tata Motors (TAMO.NS), and Daimler AG (DAIGn.DE).
In February, Fiat Chrysler told Reuters it paid $77 million in U.S. civil penalties in 2018 for failing to meet 2016 model year fuel economy requirements.
Fiat Chrysler welcomed the decision.
It "enables us to continue our significant investment plans in both our U.S. manufacturing footprint and new technologies required to maintain our trajectory of improved fuel-efficiency," the carmaker said in a statement late on Friday.
Environmental groups urge the administration to retain the increase, noting U.S. fuel economy fines have lost nearly 75% of their original value because the fines have only been increased once - from $5 to $5.50 in 1997 - in more than four decades.
The move comes as NHTSA and the Environmental Protection Agency are working to finalize a rewrite of the Obama administration's fuel efficiency requirements through 2026 in the coming months.
In August 2018, the administration proposed freezing fuel efficiency requirements and stripping California of the right to set its own vehicle-emissions rules.
Trending News
Latest News
car&bike Team | Dec 3, 2025Triumph Scrambler 400 X Offered With Free Accessories Worth Rs 13,300The scheme runs until December 31, 2025, and is available only to new buyers.2 mins read
Jaiveer Mehra | Dec 3, 2025Production-Spec Kia EV2 Debut At Brussels Motor Show 2026Kia’s smallest EV was originally unveiled as a concept at the start of 2025.1 min read
Jafar Rizvi | Dec 2, 2025India-Spec Maruti Suzuki e Vitara Unveiled: Gets Up To 543 Km RangeThe e Vitara will be offered with two battery pack options and in three variants.4 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Dec 2, 2025Maruti Suzuki e Vitara Scores 5 Stars In Bharat NCAP Crash TestThe Maruti Suzuki e Vitara earned 5 stars in both adult and child occupant protection tests. The best score for a Maruti yet.2 mins read
car&bike Team | Dec 2, 2025Skoda Auto India Achieves 5 Lakh Units Sales MilestoneThe milestone comes after 25 years, with October 2025 emerging as the best month at 8,252 units sold.2 mins read
car&bike Team | Dec 2, 2025Two-Wheeler Sales November 2025: Most Manufacturers Report Double-Digit GrowthIn the penultimate month, major two-wheeler manufacturers reported varied performances, with most brands recording year-on-year growth across domestic and export markets, while a few saw marginal declines.4 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Nov 29, 2025Mahindra XEV 9S First Drive Review: Big Electric SUV, Bigger ExpectationsThe XEV 9S lands at a time when the EV crowd is growing fast. It’s a big, born-electric, three-row SUV that starts under 20 lakh. It sits close to the XUV700 in size, but the brief is very different. Here’s what it’s like on the road.11 mins read
Bilal Firfiray | Nov 26, 2025Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e: Battle Of India’s Electric TitansWhen India made two electric SUVs battle it out, the winner is the buyer. They get a choice to take home what’s best suited for them – and read on to find out which one is better for YOU.1 min read
Janak Sorap | Nov 19, 2025Hero Xpulse 210 Vs Kawasaki KLX 230 Comparison Review: Dual-Sport DilemmaWith a price difference of just Rs 12,000, which of the two dual-sport motorcycles is meant for you?1 min read
Jaiveer Mehra | Nov 17, 20252025 Toyota Land Cruiser 300 Review: Beast From The EastThe Land Cruiser name may have a long and storied history, but does it fit the bill for an Rs 2 crore-plus SUV in India?13 mins read
Seshan Vijayraghvan | Nov 17, 2025Kia Syros 1.0 Turbo Petrol: 6000 km Long-Term Review – Final Report!I lived with the Syros for more than 6000 km, over 3 months, and in this final report, I am going to talk about the Pros, the Cons, and everything in between.1 min read



















































































































